Diagnostic accuracy of interictal source imaging in presurgical epilepsy evaluation: A systematic review from the E-PILEPSY consortium. Issue 5 (May 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Mouthaan, Brian E.; Rados, Matea; Boon, Paul; Carrette, Evelien; Diehl, Beate; Jung, Julien; Kimiskidis, Vasilios; Kobulashvili, Teia; Kuchukhidze, Giorgi; Larsson, Pål G.; Leitinger, Markus; Ryvlin, Philippe; Rugg-Gunn, Fergus; Seeck, Margitta; Vulliémoz, Serge; Huiskamp, Geertjan; Leijten, Frans S.S.; Van Eijsden, Pieter; Trinka, Eugen; Braun, Kees P.J.
• Is Part Of: Clinical neurophysiology. Volume 130:Issue 5(2019:May)
• Page Start: 845
• Page End: 855
• Publication Date: 2019-05
• Subjects: Magnetoencephalography -- Electroencephalography -- Source localization -- Surgery -- Sensitivity -- Specificity; Neurophysiology -- Periodicals; Electroencephalography -- Periodicals; Electromyography -- Periodicals; Neurology -- Periodicals; 612.8
• DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2018.12.016
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1388-2457

Abstract

Highlights: Interictal source imaging studies are biased and show heterogeneity for population and test method. Source imaging sensitivity and specificity was 82% (95% CI: 75–88%) and 53% (37–68%) respectively. Diagnostic accuracy for (extra)temporal and (non)-lesional patients show no statistical differences. Abstract: Objective: Interictal high resolution (HR-) electric source imaging (ESI) and magnetic source imaging (MSI) are non-invasive tools to aid epileptogenic zone localization in epilepsy surgery candidates. We carried out a systematic review on the diagnostic accuracy and quality of evidence of these modalities. Methods: Embase, Pubmed and the Cochrane database were searched on 13 February 2017. Diagnostic accuracy studies taking post-surgical seizure outcome as reference standard were selected. Quality appraisal was based on the QUADAS-2 framework. Results: Eleven studies were included: eight MSI ( n = 267), three HR-ESI ( n = 127) studies. None was free from bias. This mostly involved: selection of operated patients only, interference of source imaging with surgical decision, and exclusion of indeterminate results. Summary sensitivity and specificity estimates were 82% (95% CI: 75–88%) and 53% (95% CI: 37–68%) for overall source imaging, with no statistical difference between MSI and HR-ESI. Specificity is higher when partially concordant results were included as non-concordant ( p < 0.05). Inclusion of indeterminate test results as non-concordant lowered sensitivity ( p < 0.05). Conclusions: Source imaging has a relatively high sensitivity but low specificity for identification of the epileptogenic zone. Significance: We need higher quality studies allowing unbiased test evaluation to determine the added value and diagnostic accuracy of source imaging in the presurgical workup of refractory focal epilepsy.