Environmental Beta or How Institutional Investors Think about Climate Change and Fossil Fuel Risk. Issue 3 (4th May 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Christophers, Brett
• Is Part Of: Annals of the American Association of Geographers. Volume 109:Issue 3(2019)
• Page Start: 754
• Page End: 774
• Publication Date: 2019-05-04
• Subjects: climate change -- financial risk -- fossil fuel companies -- institutional investors.; 气候变迁 -- 金融危机 -- 石化公司 -- 制度投资者。; cambio climático -- compañías de combustible fósil -- inversores institucionales -- riesgo financiero.; Geography -- Periodicals; Environmental sciences -- Periodicals; Geography; Electronic journals; Periodicals; 550
• DOI: 10.1080/24694452.2018.1489213
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2469-4452

Abstract

Abstract : It is widely recognized that to limit the long-term extent of global warming and its socioecological consequences, the world must transition over future decades to a low- or zero-carbon economy. Among the many imponderables relating to this eventual transition is the role of the principal owners of the fossil fuel companies that are primarily responsible for global greenhouse gas emissions—namely, institutional financial investors. The investment behavior of these institutions will substantively shape not only the speed and nature of the economy and society's transition to cleaner energy sources but also the speed and nature of the global financial system's own parallel transition to a low- or zero-carbon world. In the wake of the global financial crisis of 2007 to 2009, governments and regulators around the world are increasingly concerned that the latter transition might represent a major potential source of future financial instability. These authorities are calling on institutional investors to effect an orderly and measured transition by fully recognizing the climate-related risks of investment in fossil fuel companies and pricing these risks appropriately. Yet they are doing so in the absence of informed, up-to-date, and meaningful knowledge of how the investment community actually thinks about climate change and fossil fuel risk. This article maps out the key lineaments of this thinking on the basis of an extensive program of interviews with global investment institutions. Contra government and regulator hopes and expectations, this thinking indicates that fossil fuel investment is set to be a long-term locus of excess, not minimal, financial market volatility: of environmental beta.