Growth trajectories in the cave bear and its extant relatives: an examination of ontogenetic patterns in phylogeny. (December 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Fuchs, Manuela; Geiger, Madeleine; Stange, Madlen; Sánchez-Villagra, Marcelo
• Is Part Of: BMC evolutionary biology. Volume 15(2015)Supplement 1
• Page Start: 1
• Page End: 10
• Publication Date: 2015-12
• Subjects: Mammalia -- Ursus -- Ontogeny -- Variation -- Disparity -- Evolution -- Morphometrics -- Cranium -- Mandible; Evolution (Biology) -- Periodicals; 576.805
• DOI: 10.1186/s12862-015-0521-z
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1471-2148

Abstract

Abstract Background The study of postnatal ontogeny can provide insights into evolution by offering an understanding of how growth trajectories have evolved resulting in adult morphological disparity. TheUrsus lineage is a good subject for studying cranial and mandibular shape and size variation in relation to postnatal ontogeny and phylogeny because it is at the same time not diverse but the species exhibit different feeding ecologies. Cranial and mandibular shapes ofUrsus arctos (brown bear), U. maritimus (polar bear), U. americanus (American black bear), and the extinctU. spelaeus (cave bear) were examined, using a three-dimensional geometric morphometric approach. Additionally, ontogenetic series of crania and mandibles ofU. arctos andU. spelaeus ranging from newborns to senile age were sampled. Results The distribution of specimens in morphospace allowed to distinguish species and age classes and the ontogenetic trajectoriesU. arctos andU. spelaeus were found to be more similar than expected by chance. Cranial shape changes during ontogeny are largely size related whereas the evolution of cranial shape disparity in this clade appears to be more influenced by dietary adaptation than by size and phylogeny. The different feeding ecologies are reflected in different cranial and mandibular shapes among species. Conclusions The cranial and mandibular shape disparity in theUrsus lineage appears to be more influenced by adaptation to diet than by size or phylogeny. In contrast, the cranial and mandibular shape changes during postnatal ontogeny inU. arctos andU. spelaeus are probably largely size related. The patterns of morphospace occupation of the cranium and the mandible in adults and through ontogeny are different.