A systematic review of the risk of motor vehicle collision after stroke or transient ischemic attack. Issue 3 (3rd April 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Rapoport, Mark J.; Plonka, Sarah C.; Finestone, Hillel; Bayley, Mark; Chee, Justin N.; Vrkljan, Brenda; Koppel, Sjaan; Linkewich, Elizabeth; Charlton, Judith L.; Marshall, Shawn; delCampo, Martin; Boulos, Mark I.; Swartz, Richard H.; Bhangu, Jaspreet; Saposnik, Gustavo; Comay, Jessica; Dow, Jamie; Ayotte, Debbie; O'Neill, Desmond
• Is Part Of: Topics in stroke rehabilitation. Volume 26:Issue 3(2019)
• Page Start: 226
• Page End: 235
• Publication Date: 2019-04-03
• Subjects: Accidents -- traffic -- automobile driving -- stroke -- ischemic attack -- transient; Cerebrovascular disease -- Patients -- Rehabilitation -- Periodicals; Cerebrovascular disease -- Periodicals; 616.810305
• DOI: 10.1080/10749357.2018.1558634
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1074-9357

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Background : Returning to driving after stroke is one of the key goals in stroke rehabilitation, and fitness to drive guidelines must be informed by evidence pertaining to risk of motor vehicle collision (MVC) in this population. Objectives : The purpose of the present study was to determine whether stroke and/or transient ischemic attack (TIA) are associated with an increased MVC risk. Methods : We searched MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and TRID through December 2016. Pairs of reviewers came to consensus on inclusion, based on an iterative review of abstracts and full-text manuscripts, on data extraction, and on the quality of evidence. Results : Reviewers identified 5, 605 citations, and 12 articles met inclusion criteria. Only one of three case-control studies showed an association between stroke and MVC (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.0–3.9). Of five cohort reports, only one study, limited to self-report, found an increased risk of MVC associated with stroke or TIA (RR 2.71, 95% CI 1.11–6.61). Two of four cross-sectional studies using computerized driving simulators identified a more than two-fold risk of MVCs among participants with stroke compared with controls. The difference in one of the studies was restricted to those with middle cerebral artery stroke. Conclusions : The evidence does not support a robust increase in risk of MVCs. While stroke clearly prevents some patients from driving at all and impairs driving performance in others, individualized assessment and clinical judgment must continue to be used in assessing and advising those stroke patients who return to driving about their MVC risk.