Textual Critique through the Artist's Eye: Dante Gabriel Rossetti's Hamlet and Ophelia (1858–59). (3rd April 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Moore, Luisa
• Is Part Of: Shakespeare. Volume 15:Number 2(2019)
• Page Start: 136
• Page End: 151
• Publication Date: 2019-04-03
• Subjects: Visual art -- artist -- illustration -- Victorian -- character analysis -- literary critique -- creative interpretation; Periodicals; 822.33
• DOI: 10.1080/17450918.2018.1494623
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1745-0918

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Nineteenth-century visual representations of Shakespeare's characters offer modern scholars a window into the nuances of the Victorian reception of his plays, and much work has been done in contextualising these images in terms of such issues as Victorian bardolatry, cultural assumptions about gender, class and race, and contemporary theatrical practices. Scholars have shown somewhat less interest, however, in exploring how complex visual representation permits a kind of free play to subversive or "inappropriate" interpretations of characters' implied interiority, interpretations which the artist might have disowned if fully articulated in prose. Stuart Sillars' invention of the idea of the "Artist as Critic" paves the way for future scholars: this article contributes to this nascent methodology and further demonstrate its benefits. Taking as a case study Dante Gabriel Rossetti's 1858–59 pen-and-ink drawing Hamlet and Ophelia, which portrays the opening of the "nunnery" scene, this paper will explore how the non-verbal, non-explicit mode of interpretation typical of visual art allowed Rossetti to subvert the sentimentalised Victorian reception of Hamlet. He drew (without, perhaps, being fully aware of what he was doing) something darker and more disturbing, more akin to the apparently innovative critique of Hamlet spearheaded by Wilson Knight in the 1930s.