Short-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial cecal tumors: a comparison between extension and nonextension into the appendiceal orifice. (30th April 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Boda, Kazuki; Oka, Shiro; Tanaka, Shinji; Tanaka, Hidenori; Matsumoto, Kenta; Yamashita, Ken; Sumimoto, Kyoku; Hirano, Daiki; Tamaru, Yuzuru; Ninomiya, Yuki; Hayashi, Nana; Chayama, Kazuaki
• Is Part Of: Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology. Volume 11(2018)
• Publication Date: 2018-04-30
• Subjects: appendix -- cecal tumors -- endoscopic submucosal dissection; Gastroenterology -- Periodicals; Digestive organs -- Diseases -- Treatment -- Periodicals; Gastrointestinal system -- Diseases -- Treatment -- Periodicals; Liver -- Diseases -- Treatment -- Periodicals; Pharmacology -- Periodicals; Gastroenterology -- Periodicals; Gastrointestinal Diseases -- therapy -- Periodicals; Liver Diseases -- therapy -- Periodicals; Pharmacology -- Periodicals; Gastroentérologie -- Périodiques; Appareil digestif -- Maladies -- Traitement -- Périodiques; Tractus gastro-intestinal -- Maladies -- Traitement -- Périodiques; Hépatologie -- Périodiques; Foie -- Maladies -- Périodiques; Pharmacologie -- Périodiques; 616.3005
• DOI: 10.1177/1756284818772794
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1756-283X

Abstract

Background: Few studies have investigated the use of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for cecal tumors extending into the appendiceal orifice. Herein, we assessed the feasibility and safety of ESD for cecal tumors extending into the appendiceal orifice. Methods: We retrospectively examined the outcomes of ESD for 78 patients with 78 cecal tumors (male/female ratio, 40/38; mean [standard deviation, SD] age, 67 [9] years; mean [SD] tumor size, 32 [15] mm), who underwent ESD at the Hiroshima University Hospital between October 2008 and March 2016. The indication for ESD in cecal tumors extending into the appendiceal orifice was recognition of the distal edge of the lesion in the appendix. They were classified into two groups: patients with cecal tumors extending (Group A: 29 patients, 29 tumors) and not extending (Group B: 49 patients, 49 tumors) into the appendiceal orifice. We compared the outcomes of ESD between both groups. Results: No significant differences in clinicopathological characteristics were observed between both groups. The rate of severe submucosal fibrosis in Group A (48%) was significantly higher than that in Group B (24%) ( p < 0.05). The mean (SD) procedure speed in Group A (14 [10] mm 2 /min) was significantly slower than that in Group B (23 [16] mm 2 /min) ( p < 0.01). The en bloc resection rates in Groups A and B were 90% and 96%, respectively. There were no significant differences in adverse events reported between both groups. Conclusions: ESD for cecal tumors with extension into the appendiceal orifice is effective and safe.