Do Race and Ethnicity Matter? An Examination of Racial/Ethnic Differences in Perceptions of Procedural Justice and Recidivism Among Problem-Solving Court Clients. (April 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Atkin-Plunk, Cassandra A.; Peck, Jennifer H.; Armstrong, Gaylene S.
• Is Part Of: Race and justice. Volume 9:Number 2(2019:Apr.)
• Page Start: 151
• Page End: 179
• Publication Date: 2019-04
• Subjects: race -- ethnicity -- procedural justice -- problem-solving courts -- recidivism; Crime and race -- United States -- Periodicals; Discrimination in criminal justice administration -- Periodicals; United States -- Race relations -- Periodicals; 364.089
• DOI: 10.1177/2153368717691800
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2153-3687

Abstract

Over the years, a distinct body of research has emerged that examines procedural justice in problem-solving courts. However, there is virtually no research to date on racial and ethnic differences in perceptions of procedural justice among problem-solving court clients. The present study seeks to understand the complexities of judicial procedural justice and race/ethnicity within problem-solving courts. Using a convenience sample of 132 clients from two problem-solving courts in a southern state, this study addresses a void in the literature by examining the influence of race/ethnicity on perceptions of procedural justice as well as the impact of race/ethnicity and procedural justice on clients' likelihood of recidivism. Results suggest that Black problem-solving court clients' have significantly lower perceptions of procedural justice, while also having a lower likelihood of recidivism. Perceptions of procedural justice did not influence recidivism outcomes. Policy implications and recommendations for future research are discussed.