Opening up the debate over 'non-western' international relations. (February 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Eun, Yong-Soo
• Is Part Of: Politics. Volume 39:Number 1(2019)
• Page Start: 4
• Page End: 17
• Publication Date: 2019-02
• Subjects: Diversity -- 'Global IR' -- IR theory -- 'non-western' international relations -- West-centrism; Political science -- Periodicals; 320
• DOI: 10.1177/0263395718805401
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0263-3957

Abstract

This opening article maps the terrain of the ongoing debate over various forms of 'non-Western' International Relations (IR) theory-building enterprise with the aim not only of providing contextual background for the Special Section, but also, and more importantly, of identifying what is missing in the overall debate. It is often pointed out that IR as a discipline is 'too Western centric', and that much of mainstream IR theory is 'simply an abstraction of Western history'. In this respect, many IR scholars have called for 'broadening' the theoretical horizon of IR while problematising the Western parochialism of the discipline, and it is increasingly acknowledged that IR needs to embrace a wider range of histories, experiences, and theoretical perspectives, particularly those outside of the West. However, despite such a meaningful debate over non-Western IR theorisation and its recent contributions, several critical questions and issues still remain unclear and under-explored. I suggest that there are (at least) three sets of questions that require more careful attention in our discussion. First, does IR need to embrace theoretical pluralism? Second, to what extent has contemporary IR become pluralistic? Third, should IR pursue the promotion of dialogue and engagement across theoretical and spatial divides? Of course, each of these questions invites several subsequent questions. This discussion will serve as a useful point from which more substantial and exciting bearings may be taken in enriching the ongoing debate and moving IR towards becoming a more pluralistic discipline.