Cardiac output measurement during exercise in COPD: A comparison of dye dilution and impedance cardiography. (28th February 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Louvaris, Zafeiris; Spetsioti, Stavroula; Andrianopoulos, Vasileios; Chynkiamis, Nikolaos; Habazettl, Helmut; Wagner, Harrieth; Zakynthinos, Spyros; Wagner, Peter D.; Vogiatzis, Ioannis
• Is Part Of: Clinical respiratory journal. Volume 13:Number 4(2019)
• Page Start: 222
• Page End: 231
• Publication Date: 2019-02-28
• Subjects: central hemodynamics -- exercise -- lung diseases -- noninvasive techniques -- thoracic impedance; Respiratory organs -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Respiratory organs -- Periodicals; 616.24
• DOI: 10.1111/crj.13002
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1752-6981

Abstract

Abstract: Introduction: Impedance cardiography (IC) derived from morphological analysis of the thoracic impedance signal is now commonly used for noninvasive assessment of cardiac output (CO) at rest and during exercise. However, in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), conflicting findings put its accuracy into question. Objectives: We therefore compared concurrent CO measurements captured by IC (PhysioFlow: COIC ) and by the indocyanine green dye dilution method (CODD ) in patients with COPD. Methods: Fifty paired CO measurements were concurrently obtained using the two methods from 10 patients (FEV1 : 50.5 ± 17.5% predicted) at rest and during cycling at 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% peak work rate. Results: From rest to peak exercise COIC and CODD were strongly correlated ( r = 0.986, P < 0.001). The mean absolute and percentage differences between COIC and CODD were 1.08 L/min (limits of agreement (LoA): 0.05‐2.11 L/min) and 18 ± 2%, respectively, with IC yielding systematically higher values. Bland‐Altman analysis indicated that during exercise only 7 of the 50 paired measurements differed by more than 20%. When data were expressed as changes from rest, correlations and agreement between the two methods remained strong over the entire exercise range ( r = 0.974, P < 0.001, with no significant difference: 0.19 L/min; LoA: −0.76 to 1.15 L/min). Oxygen uptake (VO2 ) and CODD were linearly related: r = 0.893 ( P < 0.001), CODD = 5.94 × VO2 + 2.27 L/min. Similar results were obtained for VO2 and COIC ( r = 0.885, P < 0.001, COIC = 6.00 × VO2 + 3.30 L/min). Conclusions: These findings suggest that IC provides an acceptable CO measurement from rest to peak cycling exercise in patients with COPD.