Effects of ZnSO4 and Zn‐EDTA applied by broadcasting or by banding on soil Zn fractions and Zn uptake by wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under greenhouse conditions. Issue 2 (8th March 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Zhao, Aiqing; Yang, Shu; Wang, Bini; Tian, Xiaohong
• Is Part Of: Journal of plant nutrition and soil science. Volume 182:Issue 2(2019:Apr.)
• Page Start: 307
• Page End: 317
• Publication Date: 2019-03-08
• Subjects: banded -- broadcast -- Zn‐EDTA -- Zn fractions -- ZnSO4; Plants -- Nutrition -- Periodicals; Soil science -- Periodicals; 630
• DOI: 10.1002/jpln.201800341
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1436-8730

Abstract

Abstract: Zinc biofortification of staple food crops is essential for alleviating worldwide human malnutrition. Agronomic interventions to promote this should include fertilizer selection and management. A chelated Zn source, Zn‐EDTA, and an inorganic Zn source, ZnSO4 × 7 H2 O, were applied either by banding or by broadcasting in soil, and Zn fractions in soil and Zn uptake by wheat were determined in a pot experiment. Compared to ZnSO4 × 7 H2 O, Zn‐EDTA produced higher Zn concentration in grain regardless of application method and even at a lower application rate. Residual Zn fraction was the largest Zn fraction with both ZnSO4 and Zn‐EDTA amendment. ZnSO4 banded in soil caused Zn fractions to be restricted to the Zn‐amended soil band and resulted in lower grain Zn concentrations than did broadcast ZnSO4 . Planting wheat slowed Zn fixation by promoting the maintenance of a high concentration of Zn fraction loosely bound to organic matter (LOM‐Zn) in soil. Zn‐EDTA was a better Zn source for Zn biofortification of wheat than was ZnSO4 .