A propensity‐score‐matched analysis of laparoscopic vs open surgery for rectal cancer in a population‐based study. (17th January 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- A propensity‐score‐matched analysis of laparoscopic vs open surgery for rectal cancer in a population‐based study. (17th January 2019)
- Main Title:
- A propensity‐score‐matched analysis of laparoscopic vs open surgery for rectal cancer in a population‐based study
- Authors:
- Manchon‐Walsh, P.
Aliste, L.
Biondo, S.
Espin, E.
Pera, M.
Targarona, E.
Pallarès, N.
Vernet, R.
Espinàs, J. A.
Guarga, A.
Borràs, J. M. - Abstract:
- Abstract: Aim: The oncological risk/benefit trade‐off for laparoscopy in rectal cancer is controversial. Our aim was to compare laparoscopic vs open surgery for resection of rectal cancer, using unselected data from the public healthcare system of Catalonia (Spain). Methods: This was a multicentre retrospective cohort study of all patients who had surgery with curative intent for primary rectal cancer at Catalonian public hospitals from 2011 to 2012. We obtained follow‐up data for up to 5 years. To minimize the differences between the two groups, we performed propensity score matching on baseline patient characteristics. We used multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analyses to assess locoregional relapse at 2 years and death at 2 and 5 years. Results: Of 1513 patients with Stage I–III rectal cancer, 933 (61.7%) had laparoscopy (conversion rate 13.2%). After applying our propensity score matching strategy (2:1), 842 laparoscopy patients were matched to 517 open surgery patients. Multivariate Cox analysis of death at 2 years [hazard ratio (HR) 0.65, 95% CI 0.48, 0.87; P = 0.004] and 5 years (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.5, 0.75; P < 0.001) and of local relapse at 2 years (HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.27, 0.72; P = 0.001) showed laparoscopy to be an independent protective factor compared with open surgery. Conclusions: Laparoscopy results in lower locoregional relapse and long‐term mortality in rectal cancer in unselected patients with all‐risk groups included. Studies using long‐termAbstract: Aim: The oncological risk/benefit trade‐off for laparoscopy in rectal cancer is controversial. Our aim was to compare laparoscopic vs open surgery for resection of rectal cancer, using unselected data from the public healthcare system of Catalonia (Spain). Methods: This was a multicentre retrospective cohort study of all patients who had surgery with curative intent for primary rectal cancer at Catalonian public hospitals from 2011 to 2012. We obtained follow‐up data for up to 5 years. To minimize the differences between the two groups, we performed propensity score matching on baseline patient characteristics. We used multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analyses to assess locoregional relapse at 2 years and death at 2 and 5 years. Results: Of 1513 patients with Stage I–III rectal cancer, 933 (61.7%) had laparoscopy (conversion rate 13.2%). After applying our propensity score matching strategy (2:1), 842 laparoscopy patients were matched to 517 open surgery patients. Multivariate Cox analysis of death at 2 years [hazard ratio (HR) 0.65, 95% CI 0.48, 0.87; P = 0.004] and 5 years (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.5, 0.75; P < 0.001) and of local relapse at 2 years (HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.27, 0.72; P = 0.001) showed laparoscopy to be an independent protective factor compared with open surgery. Conclusions: Laparoscopy results in lower locoregional relapse and long‐term mortality in rectal cancer in unselected patients with all‐risk groups included. Studies using long‐term follow‐up of cohorts and unselected data can provide information on clinically relevant outcomes to supplement randomized controlled trials. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Colorectal disease. Volume 21:Number 4(2019)
- Journal:
- Colorectal disease
- Issue:
- Volume 21:Number 4(2019)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 21, Issue 4 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 21
- Issue:
- 4
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0021-0004-0000
- Page Start:
- 441
- Page End:
- 450
- Publication Date:
- 2019-01-17
- Subjects:
- Rectal cancer -- laparoscopy -- population‐based -- propensity‐score analysis -- surgery
Colon (Anatomy) -- Diseases -- Periodicals
Rectum -- Diseases -- Periodicals
616.34 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/member/institutions/issuelist.asp?journal=cdi ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1111/codi.14545 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1462-8910
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3322.110000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 9749.xml