Diagnostic and Prognostic Performance of Secreted Protein Acidic and Rich in Cysteine (SPARC) Assay for Detecting Primary and Recurrent Urinary Bladder Cancer. Issue 2 (30th January 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Critselis, Elena; Rava, Marta; Marquez, Mirari; Lygirou, Vasiliki; Chatzicharalambous, Despoina; Liapi, Panagiota; Lichtinghagen, Ralph; Brand, Korbinian; Cecchini, Lluís; Vlahou, Antonia; Malats, Nuria; Zoidakis, Jerome
• Other Names: Frantzi Maria guestEditor.; Mischak Harald guestEditor.; Latosinska Agnieszka guestEditor.
• Is Part Of: Proteomics. Volume 13:Issue 2(2019)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2019-01-30
• Subjects: diagnosis -- enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay -- prognosis -- secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine -- tumor progression -- tumor relapse -- urinary bladder cancer; Proteomics -- Periodicals; 572.605
• DOI: 10.1002/prca.201800148
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1862-8346

Abstract

Abstract : Purpose: To evaluate the diagnostic and prognostic performance of Secreted Protein Acidic and Rich in Cysteine (SPARC) in detecting urinary bladder cancer (UBC). Methods: The Integrated Study on Bladder Cancer ( n = 571; mean age:69.4 ± 12.2 years) evaluates cross‐sectionally SPARC diagnostic performance in primary ( n = 264) and recurrent ( n = 307) UBC. SPARC prognostic performance is evaluated in a nested cohort ( n = 250) prospectively followed for 80 months to detect tumor relapse, recurrence and/or progression. Baseline urine samples are analyzed blindly using a commercially available SPARC ELISA assay, characterized for its analytical performance according to clinical test regulatory requirements (R&D Manufactures Inc.). Results: While higher mean SPARC levels are detected in primary ( p = 0.008) and recurrent ( p < 0.0001) UBC, the assay has limited diagnostic performance (AUC:0.593; 95% CI:0.524‐0.663). SPARC positive patients undergoing disease monitoring are more likely to develop tumor relapse (age and gender Adj. HR:1.52; 95% CI:1.04‐2.22) and progression (Adj. HR:1.83; 95% CI:1.02–3.27). However, prognostic performance is affected by hematuria. Conclusions: SPARC diagnostic performance for detecting UBC appears insufficient for clinical implementation. In patients undergoing disease monitoring, SPARC is a promising prognostic marker for tumor relapse and/or progression, but is affected by hematuria.