Food sharing and affiliation: An experimental and longitudinal study in cockatiels (Nymphicus hollandicus). (22nd March 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Liévin‐Bazin, Agatha; Pineaux, Maxime; Le Covec, Mathilde; Gahr, Manfred; Bovet, Dalila; von Bayern, Auguste M. P.
• Is Part Of: Ethology. Volume 125:Number 5(2019)
• Page Start: 276
• Page End: 288
• Publication Date: 2019-03-22
• Subjects: affiliative relationships -- cockatiels -- food sharing -- interchange -- longitudinal study -- parrots -- prosociality -- reciprocity -- social bond; Animal behavior -- Periodicals; 591.5
• DOI: 10.1111/eth.12850
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0179-1613

Abstract

Abstract: Food sharing has attracted much attention because of its apparently altruistic nature and its link to prosociality. However, food sharing has been mostly studied in a reproductive context, during courtship and parental care, where the fitness benefits are obvious. We still lack a clear understanding of the functions of food sharing outside any reproductive context and within social groups of same‐aged peers. Previous studies suggest that cofeeding, the action to let another animal feed from the same monopolizable food source, may be used to build and strengthen bonds between individuals. This may be particularly crucial in social birds forming long‐term associations between mates or siblings such as psittacids and corvids. Here, we investigated food sharing and affiliative behaviors such as allopreening in a psittacine species, namely in a group of captive juvenile cockatiels ( Nymphicus hollandicus ) consisting of five siblings and five unrelated birds. Our main objective was to study the developmental pattern of food sharing over time and its implication in social bonding depending on kinship, affiliation, and sex. Studying cockatiels in this context is providing many new information since most of the studies on food sharing in birds focused on corvids. We found that, contrary to jackdaws, cockatiels continued to share food with multiple individuals, although the frequency of cofeeding as well as the number of cofeeding partners decreased over time. Cockatiels shared more food with their siblings than with other conspecifics but they were not more likely to do cofeeding with birds of the opposite sex. We also found evidence that young cockatiels exchanged more food with those from whom they received food (reciprocity) and, to a lesser extent, allopreening (interchange), than from other cockatiels. Our findings suggest that in cockatiels, food sharing within social groups serves the formation (and maintenance) of affiliative bonds, especially between siblings, rather than pair bonds, but might additionally be explained by reciprocity, interchange, and harassment avoidance.