Accuracy of low‐dose proton CT image registration for pretreatment alignment verification in reference to planning proton CT. Issue 4 (1st April 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Cassetta, Roberto; Piersimoni, Pierluigi; Riboldi, Marco; Giacometti, Valentina; Bashkirov, Vladmir; Baroni, Guido; Ordonez, Caesar; Coutrakon, George; Schulte, Reinhard
• Is Part Of: Journal of applied clinical medical physics. Volume 20:Issue 4(2019)
• Page Start: 83
• Page End: 90
• Publication Date: 2019-04-01
• Subjects: deformable image registration -- image reconstruction -- proton CT -- rigid image registration; Medical physics -- Periodicals; Clinical medicine -- Periodicals; Health Physics; Clinical Medicine; Electronic journals; Periodicals; Periodicals; Fulltext; Internet Resources; 610.153
• DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12565
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1526-9914

Abstract

Abstract: Purpose: Proton CT (pCT) has the ability to reduce inherent uncertainties in proton treatment by directly measuring the relative proton stopping power with respect to water, thereby avoiding the uncertain conversion of X‐ray CT Hounsfield unit to relative stopping power and the deleterious effect of X‐ ray CT artifacts. The purpose of this work was to further evaluate the potential of pCT for pretreatment positioning using experimental pCT data of a head phantom. Methods: The performance of a 3D image registration algorithm was tested with pCT reconstructions of a pediatric head phantom. A planning pCT simulation scan of the phantom was obtained with 200 MeV protons and reconstructed with a 3D filtered back projection (FBP) algorithm followed by iterative reconstruction and a representative pretreatment pCT scan was reconstructed with FBP only to save reconstruction time. The pretreatment pCT scan was rigidly transformed by prescribing random errors with six degrees of freedom or deformed by the deformation field derived from a head and neck cancer patient to the pretreatment pCT reconstruction, respectively. After applying the rigid or deformable image registration algorithm to retrieve the original pCT image before transformation, the accuracy of the registration was assessed. To simulate very low‐dose imaging for patient setup, the proton CT images were reconstructed with 100%, 50%, 25%, and 12.5% of the total number of histories of the original planning pCT simulation scan, respectively. Results: The residual errors in image registration were lower than 1 mm and 1° of magnitude regardless of the anatomic directions and imaging dose. The mean residual errors ranges found for rigid image registration were from −0.29 ± 0.09 to 0.51 ± 0.50 mm for translations and from −0.05 ± 0.13 to 0.08 ± 0.08 degrees for rotations. The percentages of sub‐millimetric errors found, for deformable image registration, were between 63.5% and 100%. Conclusion: This experimental head phantom study demonstrated the potential of low‐dose pCT imaging for 3D image registration. Further work is needed to confirm the value pCT for pretreatment image‐guided proton therapy.