Characterisation and classification of Citri Reticulatae Pericarpium varieties based on UHPLC‐Q‐TOF‐MS/MS combined with multivariate statistical analyses. Issue 3 (26th December 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Zheng, Yu‐ying; Zeng, Xuan; Peng, Wei; Wu, Zhong; Su, Wei‐wei
• Is Part Of: Phytochemical analysis. Volume 30:Issue 3(2019)
• Page Start: 278
• Page End: 291
• Publication Date: 2018-12-26
• Subjects: Citri Reticulatae Pericarpium -- multivariate statistical analyses -- UHPLC‐Q‐TOF‐MS/MS; Plants -- Analysis -- Periodicals; Plants -- chemistry -- Periodicals; 572.2
• DOI: 10.1002/pca.2812
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0958-0344

Abstract

Abstract: Introduction: Citri Reticulatae Pericarpium (CRP), comprising dried pericarps of Citrus reticulata Blanco and its cultivars, is popularly used for its great medicinal and dietary values. Generally, the pericarps from C. reticulate "Chachi" ("Guangchenpi" in Chinese, GCP) is considered to have superior qualities and merit premium price compared with CRP derived from other cultivars (collectively called "Chenpi" in Chinese, CP). Since its multiple origins and derived economic adulteration, it is significant to systematically compare the chemical profiles of different CRP varieties. Objective: The main objective of this work was to identify the chemical profiles of CRP from different varieties and find out potential chemical markers for differentiating GCP and CP. Methods: In the present study, a total of 42 CRP samples from 10 varieties (including GCP and CP) were analysed by ultra‐high performance liquid chromatography‐quadrupole‐time‐of‐flight tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC‐Q‐TOF‐MS/MS) for chemical profiling. Obtained MS/MS data were further employed in multivariate statistical methods to screen the main compounds which contributed to the characterisation and classification of CRP. Results: As a result, 73 compounds (mainly flavonoids) were identified or tentatively characterised in these CRP samples. Based on the obtained chemical profiles data, GCP and CP samples could be easily discriminated from each other by statistical analyses. Moreover, seven compounds were selected as having the most discriminating features which contributed to the classification of CRP. Conclusion: This work obtains a better understanding of the chemical profiles of different CRP varieties and provides a practical strategy for the authentication of GCP and CP. Abstract : Chemical profiles of CRP from ten varieties were systematically identified. A total of 73 compounds were characterized with UHPLC‐Q‐TOF‐MS/MS. 7 compounds were selected as potential chemical markers for the classification of CRP.