How reliable is fetal occiput and spine position assessment prior to induction of labor?. (27th February 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Kamel, R.; Youssef, A.
• Is Part Of: Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology. Volume 53:Number 4(2019)
• Page Start: 535
• Page End: 540
• Publication Date: 2019-02-27
• Subjects: fetal occiput position -- fetal spine position -- induction of labor -- intrapartum ultrasound; Ultrasonics in obstetrics -- Periodicals; Generative organs, Female -- Diseases -- Diagnosis -- Periodicals; Diagnosis, Ultrasonic -- Periodicals; Genital Diseases, Female -- ultrasonography -- Periodicals; Ultrasonography, Prenatal -- Periodicals; 618.047543
• DOI: 10.1002/uog.19169
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0960-7692

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Objectives: To assess the reliability of fetal occiput and spine position determination in nulliparous women prior to induction of labor (IOL), and to evaluate identification of fetal occiput and spine positions prior to IOL in the prediction of labor outcome. Methods: A series of 136 nulliparous women were recruited prospectively, immediately after the decision to perform IOL was made. Transabdominal ultrasound was performed to determine fetal head and spine positions. After at least 1 h, and prior to IOL, fetal occiput and spine positions were reassessed. Fetal occiput and spine positions were then compared between women who underwent vaginal delivery and those who delivered by Cesarean section. Results: On the first and second assessments, respectively, fetal occiput position was anterior in 55 (40.4%) and 62 (45.6%) women, transverse in 52 (38.2%) and 49 (36.0%) women, and posterior in 29 (21.3%) and 25 (18.4%) women, while fetal spine position was anterior in 58 (42.6%) and 52 (38.2%) women, transverse in 42 (30.9%) and 50 (36.8%) women, and posterior in 36 (26.5%) and 34 (25.0%) women. Discordance between the first and second assessments of fetal occiput position was identified in 34 (25.0%) women, whereas discordance of fetal spine position was observed in 40 (29.4%) women. The incidence of fetal occiput posterior position in women undergoing Cesarean section was comparable to that in the vaginal‐delivery group (19 (18.8%) vs 6 (17.1%); P = 0.826), which was similarly the case for fetal posterior spine position (27 (26.7%) vs 7 (20%); P = 0.428). Women with fetal occiput posterior position had a longer induction‐to‐delivery interval in comparison to those with non‐occiput posterior fetal position (1786 ± 805 vs 1347 ± 784 min; P = 0.013). Conclusions: Fetal occiput and spine positions are dynamic in a considerable proportion of women undergoing IOL, and their assessment does not seem to correlate with mode of delivery. Occiput and spine position assessment in women prior to IOL is unlikely to be clinically useful. Copyright © 2018 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.