Emerging trends: GANs vs. good enough. (1st April 2019) - Church, Kenneth Ward
Abstract: General Adversarial Networks (GANs) are hot. Murphy's Law, it is prudent to be paranoid. Best not to design for the average case. There is a long tradition of designing for the hundred-year flood (and five 9s reliability). What is good enough? Historically, the market hasn't been willing to pay for five 9s. Hard to justify upfront costs for future benefits that will only payoff under unlikely scenarios, and might not work when needed. If the market isn't willing to pay for five 9s, can we afford to design for the worst case?