Effects of thoracic epidural anesthesia/analgesia on the stress response, pain relief, hospital stay, and treatment costs of patients with esophageal carcinoma undergoing thoracic surgery: A single-center, randomized controlled trial. Issue 7 (February 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Li, Yan; Dong, Hongquan; Tan, Shanbai; Qian, Yanning; Jin, Wenjie
• Other Names: Ding. Jianxun section editor.
• Is Part Of: Medicine. Volume 98:Issue 7(2019)
• Publication Date: 2019-02
• Subjects: hospital stay -- pain -- patient-controlled epidural analgesia -- patient-controlled intravenous analgesia -- stress response -- thoracic epidural anesthesia -- treatment cost; Medicine -- Periodicals; Medicine -- Periodicals; Médecine -- Périodiques; Geneeskunde; Medicine; Periodicals; Periodicals; 610.5
• DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000014362
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0025-7974

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Appropriate postoperative pain management can improve outcomes in patients with esophageal cancer (EC). Objective: To compare different combinations of anesthesia and analgesia techniques in patients with EC undergoing open thoracotomy. Methods: This randomized, controlled, open-label trial enrolled 100 patients with EC (aged 40–65 years; American Society of Anesthesiologists [ASA] grade I/II) receiving elective surgery at Jiangsu Province Hospital (China) between July 2016 and December 2017. Patients were randomized to 4 groups (n = 25 per group): total intravenous general anesthesia plus patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (TIVA/PCIA); TIVA plus patient-controlled epidural analgesia (TIVA/PCEA); thoracic epidural anesthesia with intravenous general anesthesia plus PCIA (TEA-IVA/PCIA); and TEA-IVA/PCEA (TEA-IVA plus PCEA). Primary outcomes were plasma cortisol level (measured at baseline, 2 h after skin incision, surgery completion, and 24 and 48 h post-surgery) and pain (assessed at 24, 48, and 72 hours post-surgery using a visual analog scale). Secondary outcomes included time to first flatus, hospital stay and treatment costs. Postoperative adverse events (AEs) were analyzed. Results: Baseline and operative characteristics were similar between the 4 groups. Plasma cortisol level increased ( P <.05 vs baseline) earlier in the TIVA groups (2 h after skin incision) than in the TEA-IVA groups (24 h after surgery). At 48 hours after surgery, plasma cortisol had returned to baseline levels in the PCEA groups but not in the PCIA groups. VAS pain scores at rest and during coughing were lower in the PCEA groups than in the PCIA groups ( P <.05). Compared with the PCIA groups, the PCEA groups had shorter time to first flatus and shorter hospital stay, while use of TEA-IVA lowered the costs of intraoperative anesthesia ( P <.05). However, the PCEA groups had a higher incidence of nausea, vomiting, and pruritus. Conclusion: Thoracic epidural anesthesia/analgesia can reduce the stress response, improve postoperative recovery and reduce hospital stay and costs for patients with EC.