Biomechanical Investigation of an Integrated 2-Screw Cephalomedullary Nail Versus a Sliding Hip Screw in Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures. Issue 2 (February 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Santoni, Brandon G.; Diaz, Miguel A.; Stoops, T. Kyle; Lannon, Sean; Ali, Ashley; Sanders, Roy W.
• Is Part Of: Journal of orthopaedic trauma. Volume 33:Issue 2(2019)
• Publication Date: 2019-02
• Subjects: intertrochanteric hip fracture -- fracture stability -- implant design -- biomechanics; Orthopedics -- Periodicals; Wounds and injuries -- Periodicals; Orthopedics -- Periodicals; Wounds and Injuries -- therapy -- Periodicals; Periodicals; 617.47044
• DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001351
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0890-5339

Abstract

Abstract : Objective: To compare the efficacy of 2 intertrochanteric (IT) fracture fixation devices in conferring mechanical stability to unstable IT femur fractures. Methods: Nine pairs of cadaveric female femurs with a groupwise average bone quality indicative of osteopenia were used. An unstable IT fracture without calcar support (OTA/AO 31-A2) was created and stabilized with either a sliding hip screw and side plate (SHS) or a cephalomedullary nail using an integrated dual-screw fixation [InterTAN (ITN)]. Constructs were evaluated under stepwise and increasing cyclic loading up to 50, 000 cycles (1500 N) or by failure in a test model that may best simulate hip joint contact forces at heel strike. Number of cycles to failure, failure load, and femoral head rotation about the screw axis were compared between groups. Results: The average number of cycles in the ITN group was greater compared with that in the SHS group (48, 383 vs. 31, 403 cycles, P = 0.046). Similarly, the average maximum load survived by the ITN group was greater than that of the SHS group (1456 vs. 1113 N, P = 0.046). The number of constructs that survived up to the maximum applied load of 1500 N was greater in the ITN group (8/9, 89%) when compared with that of the SHS constructs (3/9, 33%) ( P = 0.049). Finally, the ITN group conferred greater rotational control of the femoral head compared with the SHS constructs (1.5 vs. 5.5 degrees, P = 0.018), and reduced the amount of varus collapse (11.1 vs. 31.1 degrees, P = 0.038). Conclusions: The integrated dual-screw construct appeared to confer significantly greater fracture stability compared with a sliding hip screw and side plate using a worst-case model that simulates heel strike during gait. Study data provide biomechanical evidence that the ITN device may provide more stability and rotational resistance than a sliding hip screw in the elderly female patient population with an unstable IT fracture and compromised bone quality.