Conceptions of Conflict in Organizational Conflict Research: Toward Critical Reflexivity. (April 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Mikkelsen, Elisabeth Naima; Clegg, Stewart
• Is Part Of: Journal of management inquiry. Volume 28:Number 2(2019)
• Page Start: 166
• Page End: 179
• Publication Date: 2019-04
• Subjects: Organizational conflict -- conflict management -- philosophy of science -- reflexivity -- theorizing; Management -- Periodicals; Organizational behavior -- Periodicals; 658.005
• DOI: 10.1177/1056492617716774
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1056-4926

Abstract

Diverse and often unacknowledged assumptions underlie organizational conflict research. In this essay, we identify distinct ways of conceptualizing conflict in the theoretical domain of organizational conflict with the aim of setting a new critical agenda for reflexivity in conflict research. In doing so, we first apply a genealogical approach to study conceptions of conflict, and we find that three distinct and essentially contested conceptions frame studies of conflict at work. Second, we employ two empirical examples of conflict to illustrate how organizational conflict research can benefit from a more reflexive approach and advance our understanding of conflict. In this essay, we emphasize how philosophical and political assumptions about conflict frame knowledge production within the field and we encourage future theory development to build on different notions of conflict to become better at coping with the complex and dynamic nature of conflict.