Careerists Versus Coal-Miners: Welfare Reforms and the Substantive Representation of Social Groups in the British Labour Party. (March 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: O'Grady, Tom
• Is Part Of: Comparative political studies. Volume 52:Number 4(2019)
• Page Start: 544
• Page End: 578
• Publication Date: 2019-03
• Subjects: political parties -- representation and electoral systems -- legislative studies -- political economy; Political science -- Periodicals; 320.05
• DOI: 10.1177/0010414018784065
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0010-4140

Abstract

Many parties have seen declines in working-class legislators and increases in professional career politicians. I argue that career politicians are more likely to adopt policies for strategic political reasons, whereas working-class politicians are more likely to represent the interests of working-class voters. Changes in the representation of these occupational groups matter substantively whenever legislators' strategic concerns contradict the interests of working-class voters. Welfare reforms adopted in the 1990s and 2000s by the British Labour Party exhibit this divergence. The two types of politicians held very different policy positions, which I measure using a scaling method applied to all speeches made about welfare in the House of Commons from 1987 to 2007. The results carry over to voting behavior and are robust to alternative explanations, including other characteristics of both MPs and their voters. The changing representation of occupational groups has therefore had substantive policy effects, lowering the political influence of working-class voters.