Prediction of survival with second-line therapy in biliary tract cancer: Actualisation of the AGEO CT2BIL cohort and European multicentre validations. (April 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Prediction of survival with second-line therapy in biliary tract cancer: Actualisation of the AGEO CT2BIL cohort and European multicentre validations. (April 2019)
- Main Title:
- Prediction of survival with second-line therapy in biliary tract cancer: Actualisation of the AGEO CT2BIL cohort and European multicentre validations
- Authors:
- Evesque, Ludovic
Heurgué, Alexandra
Desramé, Jérôme
Lecomte, Thierry
Cacheux, Wulfran
Bachet, Jean-Baptiste
Phelip, Jean-Marc
Hautefeuille, Vincent
Hammoudi, Nassim
Mary, Florence
Locher, Christophe
Bidault-Thirot, Anne
Marthey, Lysiane
Touchefeu, Yann
Moulin, Valérie
Zaanan, Aziz
Taïeb, Julien
Casagrande, Mariaelena
Murgioni, Sabina
Santini, Daniele
Fornaro, Lorenzo
Montagnani, Francesco
Leone, Francesco
Faloppi, Luca
Giommoni, Elisa
Lutrino, Stefania Eufemia
Palloni, Andrea
Brunetti, Oronzo
Bergamo, Francesca
Vasile, Enrico
Malka, David
Propper, David
Neuzillet, Cindy
Casadei Gardini, Andrea
Brieau, Bertrand
Vivaldi, Caterina
Smolenschi, Cristina
Brandi, Giovanni
Tougeron, David
Filippi, Roberto
Vienot, Angélique
Silvestris, Nicola
Pointet, Anne-Laure
Lonardi, Sara
Rousseau, Benoît
Scartozzi, Mario
Dahan, Laetitia
Aprile, Giuseppe
Boussaha, Tarek
Malka, David
Crusz, Shantini M.
Le Sourd, Samuel
Meurisse, Aurélia
Lièvre, Astrid
Vernerey, Dewi
… (more) - Abstract:
- Abstract: Background: The benefit of second-line chemotherapy (L2) over standard first-line (L1) gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GEMCIS) or oxaliplatin (GEMOX) chemotherapy in advanced biliary tract cancer (aBTC) is unclear. Our aim was to identify and validate prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) with L2 in aBTC to guide clinical decisions in this setting. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of four prospective patient cohorts: a development cohort (28 French centres) and three validation cohorts from Italy, UK and France. All consecutive patients with aBTC receiving L2 after GEMCIS/GEMOX L1 between 2003 and 2016 were included. The association of clinicobiological data with OS was investigated in univariate and multivariate Cox analyses. A simple score was derived from the multivariate model. Results: The development cohort included 405 patients treated with L1 GEMOX (91%) or GEMCIS. Of them, 55.3% were men, and median age was 64.8 years. Prior surgical resection was observed in 26.7%, and 94.8% had metastatic disease. Performance status (PS) was 0, 1 and 2 in 17.8%, 52.4% and 29.7%, respectively. Among 22 clinical parameters, eight were associated with OS in univariate analysis. In multivariate analysis, four were independent prognostic factors ( p < 0.05): PS, reason for L1 discontinuation, prior resection of primary tumour and peritoneal carcinomatosis. The model had the Harrell's concordance index of 0.655, a good calibration and was validated in theAbstract: Background: The benefit of second-line chemotherapy (L2) over standard first-line (L1) gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GEMCIS) or oxaliplatin (GEMOX) chemotherapy in advanced biliary tract cancer (aBTC) is unclear. Our aim was to identify and validate prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) with L2 in aBTC to guide clinical decisions in this setting. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of four prospective patient cohorts: a development cohort (28 French centres) and three validation cohorts from Italy, UK and France. All consecutive patients with aBTC receiving L2 after GEMCIS/GEMOX L1 between 2003 and 2016 were included. The association of clinicobiological data with OS was investigated in univariate and multivariate Cox analyses. A simple score was derived from the multivariate model. Results: The development cohort included 405 patients treated with L1 GEMOX (91%) or GEMCIS. Of them, 55.3% were men, and median age was 64.8 years. Prior surgical resection was observed in 26.7%, and 94.8% had metastatic disease. Performance status (PS) was 0, 1 and 2 in 17.8%, 52.4% and 29.7%, respectively. Among 22 clinical parameters, eight were associated with OS in univariate analysis. In multivariate analysis, four were independent prognostic factors ( p < 0.05): PS, reason for L1 discontinuation, prior resection of primary tumour and peritoneal carcinomatosis. The model had the Harrell's concordance index of 0.655, a good calibration and was validated in the three external cohorts (N = 392). Conclusion: We validated previously reported predictive factors of OS with L2 and identified peritoneal carcinomatosis as a new pejorative factor in nearly 800 patients. Our model and score may be useful in daily practice and for future clinical trial design. Highlights: We analysed nearly 800 patients with advanced biliary tract cancer treated with second-line chemotherapy (L2) for factors predictive of overall survival (OS). We validated some previously reported independent prognostic factors: performance status, first-line efficacy, primary tumour surgery, and carbohydrate antigen 19-9. We identified peritoneal carcinomatosis as a new pejorative prognostic factor. We developed and validated a prognostic model and score (CT2BIL score) which allow the identification of patients with poor OS who are unlikely to benefit from L2. The CT2BIL score may be useful to guide clinicians' decision and in clinical trials for the stratification of patient randomisation and pre-planned subgroup analyses. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- European journal of cancer. Volume 111(2019)
- Journal:
- European journal of cancer
- Issue:
- Volume 111(2019)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 111, Issue 2019 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 111
- Issue:
- 2019
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0111-2019-0000
- Page Start:
- 94
- Page End:
- 106
- Publication Date:
- 2019-04
- Subjects:
- Cholangiocarcinoma -- Palliative chemotherapy -- Prognosis -- Prognostic biomarker -- Stratification
95% CI 95% confidence interval -- BSC best supportive care -- BTC biliary tract cancer -- CCA cholangiocarcinoma -- CA19-9 carbohydrate antigen 19-9 -- CR complete response -- ECOG Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group -- GEMCIS gemcitabine plus cisplatin -- GEMOX gemcitabine plus oxaliplatin -- HR hazard ratio -- IQR interquartile range -- L1 first-line (treatment) -- L2 second-line (treatment) -- OS overall survival -- PD progressive disease -- PFS progression-free survival -- PR partial response -- PS performance status -- RECIST Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours -- SD stable disease -- UK United Kingdom
Cancer -- Periodicals
Neoplasms -- Periodicals
Cancer -- Périodiques
Cancer
Tumors
Electronic journals
Periodicals
Electronic journals
616.994 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/09598049 ↗
http://rzblx1.uni-regensburg.de/ezeit/warpto.phtml?colors=7&jour_id=2879 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com/dura/browse/journalIssue/09598049 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com.au/dura/browse/journalIssue/09598049 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.01.019 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0959-8049
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3829.725100
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 9677.xml