Analysis of water transport in unsaturated conditions: Comparison between labcrete and fieldcrete. (30th April 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Poyet, Stéphane; Bary, Benoit; Coppens, Erik
• Is Part Of: Construction & building materials. Volume 205(2019)
• Page Start: 443
• Page End: 455
• Publication Date: 2019-04-30
• Subjects: Labcrete -- Fieldcrete -- Permeability -- Inverse analysis -- 3D mesostructure; Building materials -- Periodicals; 624.18
• DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.02.034
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0950-0618

Abstract

Highlights: Investigation of the difference in permeability between labcrete and fieldcrete. The fieldcrete specimens showed more experimental scatter. Similar intrinsic permeability but different pore-interaction factors. Numerical simulations on reconstructed 3D microstructures were performed. Most of the variability may originate from the paste itself and not from granular packing. Abstract: The differences in unsaturated permeability between concrete prepared in the laboratory (labcrete) and on a real construction site (fieldcrete) were investigated experimentally and using inverse analysis. Although more porous, the fieldcrete specimens were shown to have an average permeability very close to the labcrete ones. The fieldcrete permeabilities also exhibited more variability than the labcrete ones. Numerical simulations performed on 3D reconstructed concrete specimens showed that differences in coarse aggregate distribution cannot explain the variability observed at the macroscopic scale and that an important part may originate from the properties of mortar matrix.