Biomechanical Comparison of 3 Novel Repair Techniques for Radial Tears of the Medial Meniscus: The 2-Tunnel Transtibial Technique, a "Hybrid" Horizontal and Vertical Mattress Suture Configuration, and a Combined "Hybrid Tunnel" Technique. Issue 3 (March 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Buckley, Patrick S.; Kemler, Bryson R.; Robbins, Colin M.; Aman, Zachary S.; Storaci, Hunter W.; Dornan, Grant J.; LaPrade, Robert F.
• Is Part Of: American journal of sports medicine. Volume 47:Issue 3(2019)
• Page Start: 651
• Page End: 658
• Publication Date: 2019-03
• Subjects: radial tear -- inside-out repair -- medial meniscus -- tunnel -- hybrid -- rip stop sutures; Sports medicine -- Periodicals; Sports injuries -- Periodicals; Orthopedic surgery -- Periodicals; 617.102705
• DOI: 10.1177/0363546518816949
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0363-5465

Abstract

Background: Historically, radial meniscal tears were treated with partial or near-total meniscectomy, which usually resulted in poor outcomes. Radial meniscal tears function similar to a total meniscectomy and are challenging to treat. Repair of radial meniscal tears should be performed to prevent joint deterioration and the need for salvage procedures in the future. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose was to compare 3 repair techniques for radial tears of the medial meniscus: the 2-tunnel, hybrid, and hybrid tunnel techniques. It was hypothesized that there would be no differences among the 3 groups in regard to gapping and ultimate failure strength. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Thirty human male cadaver knees (10 matched pairs, n = 20; 10 unpaired, n = 10) were used to compare the 2-tunnel, hybrid, and hybrid tunnel repairs. A complete radial tear was made at the midbody of the medial meniscus. Repairs were performed according to the described techniques. Specimens were potted and mounted on a universal material testing machine where each specimen was cyclically loaded for 1000 cycles before experiencing a pull to failure. Gap distances at the tear site, ultimate failure load, and failure location were measured and recorded. Results: After 1000 cycles of cyclic loading, there were no significant differences in displacement among the 2-tunnel repair (3.0 ± 1.7 mm), hybrid repair (3.0 ± 0.9 mm), and hybrid tunnel repair (2.3 ± 1.0 mm; P = .4042). On pull-to-failure testing, there were also no significant differences in ultimate failure strength among the 2-tunnel repair (259 ± 103 N), hybrid repair (349 ± 149 N), and hybrid tunnel repair (365 ± 146 N; P = .26). However, the addition of vertical mattress sutures to act as a "rip stop" significantly reduced the likelihood of the sutures pulling through the meniscus during pull-to-failure testing for the hybrid and hybrid tunnel repairs (4 of 16, 25%) as compared with the 2-tunnel repair (7 of 9, 78%; P = .017). Conclusion: The results showed equivalent biomechanical testing with regard to gap distance and pull-to-failure strength among the 3 repairs. The addition of the vertical mattress sutures to act as a rip stop was effective in preventing meniscal cutout through the meniscus. Clinical Relevance: Effective healing of radial meniscal tears after repair is paramount to prevent joint deterioration and symptom development. Each tested repair showed a biomechanically equivalent and stable construct to use to repair radial meniscal tears. The authors recommend that rip stop vertical mattress sutures be used, especially in poor-quality meniscal tissue, to prevent suture cutout.