Effect of various blended fuels on syngas quality and performance in catalytic co-gasification: A review. (May 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Effect of various blended fuels on syngas quality and performance in catalytic co-gasification: A review. (May 2019)
- Main Title:
- Effect of various blended fuels on syngas quality and performance in catalytic co-gasification: A review
- Authors:
- Inayat, Muddasser
Sulaiman, Shaharin A.
Kurnia, Jundika Candra
Shahbaz, Muhammad - Abstract:
- Abstract: Gasification is a well proven thermal conversion technology that has been used to convert solid fuel into gaseous fuel. There are different types of conventional feedstocks such as coal and biomass that have been gasified in either individual or blended form. The advantage of co-gasification over typical gasification is the ability to obtain the desired product gas composition by varying the blending ratio and feedstock. Furthermore, it is applicable for many feedstocks such as sewage sludge, black liquor, glycerol, and municipal solid waste. These feedstocks have good thermophysical properties, however, gasification of these feedstocks is difficult using a conventional technique, thus highlighting the need for co-gasification. Recently, the effect of feedstock type and their blending for syngas production have attracted interest among researchers especially when feedstocks are non-conventional. Several review articles have been published on gasification of individual coal and biomass. However, no review that exhaustively dealt with the catalytic co-gasification of a different kind of conventional and non-conventional feedstock. The feedstock type and blending ratio of feedstock are the most important parameters that affect the co-gasification process. The objective of the current paper is therefore to review the effect of feedstock type and their blending ratio on syngas quality, co-gasification performance, and tar formation for catalytic co-gasification of bothAbstract: Gasification is a well proven thermal conversion technology that has been used to convert solid fuel into gaseous fuel. There are different types of conventional feedstocks such as coal and biomass that have been gasified in either individual or blended form. The advantage of co-gasification over typical gasification is the ability to obtain the desired product gas composition by varying the blending ratio and feedstock. Furthermore, it is applicable for many feedstocks such as sewage sludge, black liquor, glycerol, and municipal solid waste. These feedstocks have good thermophysical properties, however, gasification of these feedstocks is difficult using a conventional technique, thus highlighting the need for co-gasification. Recently, the effect of feedstock type and their blending for syngas production have attracted interest among researchers especially when feedstocks are non-conventional. Several review articles have been published on gasification of individual coal and biomass. However, no review that exhaustively dealt with the catalytic co-gasification of a different kind of conventional and non-conventional feedstock. The feedstock type and blending ratio of feedstock are the most important parameters that affect the co-gasification process. The objective of the current paper is therefore to review the effect of feedstock type and their blending ratio on syngas quality, co-gasification performance, and tar formation for catalytic co-gasification of both conventional and non-conventional feedstocks. This review highlights the need for research and development in co-gasification and also provides the research gap for further research to develop a state of art technologies. Highlights: Review of catalytic co-gasification of different feedstocks blends. Advantages of co-gasification of different feedstocks in combinations. Effect of blends on syngas production, gasification performance, and tar formation. Potential of miscellaneous and emerging feedstocks for catalytic co-gasification. Highlights the need for research and development in co-gasification. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Renewable & sustainable energy reviews. Volume 105(2019)
- Journal:
- Renewable & sustainable energy reviews
- Issue:
- Volume 105(2019)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 105, Issue 2019 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 105
- Issue:
- 2019
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0105-2019-0000
- Page Start:
- 252
- Page End:
- 267
- Publication Date:
- 2019-05
- Subjects:
- Catalytic co-gasification -- Blending ratio -- Syngas quality -- Tar formation
Renewable energy sources -- Periodicals
Power resources -- Periodicals
Énergies renouvelables -- Périodiques
Ressources énergétiques -- Périodiques
333.794 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/13640321 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗
http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-and-sustainable-energy-reviews ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.rser.2019.01.059 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1364-0321
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 7364.186000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 9655.xml