Greater reduction in mid-treatment FDG-PET volume may be associated with worse survival in non-small cell lung cancer. (March 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Kong, Feng-Ming (Spring); Li, Ling; Wang, Weili; Campbell, Jeff; Waller, Jennifer L.; Piert, Morand; Gross, Milton; Cheng, Monica; Owen, Dawn; Stenmark, Matthew; Huang, Ke Colin; Frey, Kirk A.; Ten Haken, Randall K.; Lawrence, Theodore S.
• Is Part Of: Radiotherapy and oncology. Volume 132(2019)
• Page Start: 241
• Page End: 249
• Publication Date: 2019-03
• Subjects: FDG-PET -- Metabolic tumor volume -- Mid-treatment -- Non-small cell lung cancer; Oncology -- Periodicals; Radiotherapy -- Periodicals; Tumors -- Periodicals; Medical Oncology -- Periodicals; Neoplasms -- radiotherapy -- Periodicals; Radiotherapy -- Periodicals; Radiothérapie -- Périodiques; Cancérologie -- Périodiques; Tumeurs -- Périodiques; Electronic journals; 616.9940642
• DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.10.006
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0167-8140

Abstract

Highlights: Changes in PET/CT tumor volume at mid-treatment correlate with lung cancer survival. There is an inverse relationship between PET-volume reduction and overall survival. Mid-treatment PET/CT-adapted therapy may improve overall survival for lung cancer. Abstract: Background and purpose: This study tested the hypotheses that 1) changes in mid-treatment fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET) parameters are predictive of overall survival (OS) and 2) mid-treatment FDG-PET–adapted treatment has the potential to improve survival in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Material and methods: Patients with stage I-III NSCLC requiring daily fractionated radiation were eligible. FDG-PET-CT scans were obtained prior to and mid-treatment with radiotherapy at 40–50 Gy. The normalized maximum standardized uptake value (NSUVmax), normalized mean SUV (NSUVmean), PET-metabolic tumor volume (MTV), total lesion glycolysis (TLG), and computed tomography-based gross tumor volume (CT-GTV) were consistently measured for all patients. The primary study endpoint was OS. Results: The study is comprised of 102 patients who received 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy, among whom 30 patients who received mid-treatment PET-adapted dose escalation radiotherapy. All PET-CT parameters decreased significantly (P < 0.001) mid-treatment, with greater reductions in FDG-volumetric parameters compared to FDG-activity factors. Mid-treatment changes in MTV (P = 0.053) and TLG (P = 0.021) were associated with OS, while changes in NSUVmax, NSUVmean, and CT-GTV were not (all Ps>0.1). Patients receiving conventional radiation (60-70 Gy) with MTV reductions greater than the mean had a median survival of 14 months, compared to those with MTV reductions less than the mean who had a median survival of 22 months. By contrast, patients receiving mid-treatment PET-adapted radiation with MTV reductions greater than the mean had a median survival of 33 months, compared to those with MTV reductions less than the mean who had a median survival of 19 months. Overall, PET-adapted treatment resulted in a 19% better 5-year survival than conventional radiation. Conclusion: Changes in mid-treatment PET-volumetric parameters were significantly associated with survival in NSCLC. A greater reduction in the mid-treatment MTV was associated with worse survival in patients treated with standard radiation, but with better survival in patients who received mid-treatment PET-adapted treatment.