Analysis of differences in laxities and neutral positions from native after kinematically aligned TKA using cruciate retaining implants. Issue 2 (3rd January 2019) - Roth, Joshua D.
ABSTRACT: One biomechanical goal of kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty (KA TKA) is to achieve knee laxities and neutral positions that are not different from those of the native knee without soft tissue release. However, replacing the articular surfaces and menisci with implants of discrete sizes and average shapes and resecting the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) might prevent KA TKA from achieving this goal in the tibiofemoral joint. Accordingly, the objective was to determine whether either or both surgically induced changes cause differences in laxities and/or neutral positions from native using a cruciate retaining implant. Eight laxities and four neutral positions were measured from 0° to 120° flexion in 30° increments in 13 human cadaveric knees in three knee conditions: native, ACL‐deficient, and KA TKA. After KA TKA, 5 of the 40 laxity measures (8 laxities × 5 flexion angles) and 6 of the 20 neutral position measures (4 neutral positions × 5 flexion angles) were statistically different from those of the native knee. The greatest differences in laxities from native after KA TKA occurred at 30° flexion in anterior translation (1.6 ± 2.1 mm increase, p < 0.0001); this difference was 1.7 ± 2.1 mm less than that in the ACL‐d knee ( p < 0.0001). The greatest difference in neutral positions from native after KA TKA occurred in anterior–posterior translation at 0° flexion (3.8 ± 1.9 mm anterior, p < 0.0001); this difference was 2.6 ± 1.9 mm greater than that in the ACL‐d knee ( p = 0.0002). Clinical Significance : These results indicate that the biomechanical goal of KA TKA is largely realized despite the two surgically induced changes. © 2018 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 37:358–369, 2019.