Childhood health and education outcomes following early term induction for large‐for‐gestational age: A population‐based record linkage study. (23rd December 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Ibiebele, Ibinabo; Bowen, Jennifer R.; Nippita, Tanya A.; Morris, Jonathan M.; Ford, Jane B.
• Is Part Of: Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica. Volume 98:Number 4(2019)
• Page Start: 423
• Page End: 432
• Publication Date: 2018-12-23
• Subjects: birth injuries -- dystocia -- fetal macrosomia -- gestational age -- hospitalization -- induction of labor -- large‐for‐gestational age -- literacy; Gynecology -- Periodicals; Pregnancy -- Periodicals; Obstetrics -- Periodicals; 618.05
• DOI: 10.1111/aogs.13511
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0001-6349

Abstract

Abstract: Introduction: There is debate about optimal management of pregnancies with a large‐for‐gestational age baby. A recent randomized controlled trial reported that early term induction of labor reduced cesarean section rates and infant morbidity. However, long term childhood outcomes have not been assessed. The aim of this study was to assess maternal, neonatal and child health and education outcomes for large‐for‐gestational age babies induced at 37‐38 weeks' gestation. Material and methods: Population‐based record linkage study of term (37+ weeks), cephalic‐presenting singleton pregnancies with a large‐for‐gestational age baby in New South Wales, Australia, 2002‐2006. Linked birth, hospital, mortality and education data were used with at least 9 years follow up from birth. Exposure was induction of labor at 37‐38 weeks, compared to expectant management (spontaneous birth at ≥37 weeks and planned births at ≥39 weeks). Relative risks and 95% confidence intervals were estimated using Modified Poisson regression with robust variance. Results: Among 10 174 eligible pregnancies, 412 (4.0%) had an induction at 37‐38 weeks. Women in the induction group were less likely to have a cesarean section (RR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.51‐0.82). Infants had higher rates of: low Apgar scores, birth trauma, neonatal jaundice and phototherapy use, and admission to special care nursery or neonatal intensive care than their expectantly managed counterparts. As children, they had higher rates of hospital admission (RR: 1.16, 95% CI: 1.04‐1.30) and special needs (RR: 1.98, 95% CI: 1.12‐3.50). However, by age 8 there was no difference in overall literacy and numeracy achievement. Conclusions: Although women who had an early term labor induction with large‐for‐gestational age were less likely to have a cesarean section, the increased risk of neonatal morbidities and additional healthcare utilization suggests the need for caution in early induction of large‐for‐gestational age babies before 39 weeks' gestation.