Changes in the Provision of Day Services in Ireland to Adult Persons With Intellectual Disability. Issue 1 (19th December 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: McConkey, Roy; Kelly, Fionnola; Craig, Sarah; Keogh, Fiona
• Is Part Of: Journal of policy and practice in intellectual disabilities. Volume 16:Issue 1(2019)
• Page Start: 13
• Page End: 20
• Publication Date: 2018-12-19
• Subjects: employment -- day care centers -- day services -- Ireland; Mental retardation -- Periodicals; People with mental disabilities -- Services for -- Periodicals; Developmental disabilities -- Periodicals; Learning disabilities -- Periodicals; 362.205
• DOI: 10.1111/jppi.12261
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1741-1122

Abstract

Abstract: Internationally, changes are advocated in the support available to persons with intellectual disability. Socially inclusive personalized arrangements are intended to replace congregated and segregated day services. The study examines the changes in the provision of day services within Ireland over a 5‐year period when new policies were being promoted but at time of economic stringencies. Secondary analysis was carried out on data extracted from the National Intellectual Disability Database on all persons aged 18 years and above in 2009 and 2014 who received day services, which were grouped into four main types: care centers, sheltered workshops, employment schemes, and vocational training. Participants in each type of service were profiled by age, level of disability, and living arrangements. Variations in the provision of these services across nine regions were also examined. In 2009, 59% of persons attended care centers, but the proportion had increased in 2014 to 69%. There were reductions in the numbers attending sheltered workshops (down from 23 to 16%) and those receiving employment supports (down from 13 to 11%). By 2014, variations in the numbers attending care centers were evident across the country. The increase in care provision does not accord with national or international policies. Rather, it may reflect ineffective policy implementation strategies and financial cutbacks which services experienced during this period. This study illustrates the value of a national dataset for monitoring policy implementation.