The Challenges of a Vertical Evacuation Drill. Issue 1 (27th December 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Salway, Richard J. (RJ); Adler, Zachary; Williams, Trenika; Nwoke, Francisca; Roblin, Patricia; Arquilla, Bonnie
• Is Part Of: Prehospital and disaster medicine. Volume 34:Issue 1(2019)
• Page Start: 25
• Page End: 29
• Publication Date: 2018-12-27
• Subjects: disasters, -- emergencies, -- hospital departments, -- renal transplantation, -- surveys and questionnaires; Emergency medical services -- Periodicals; Emergency medicine -- Periodicals; Disaster medicine -- Periodicals; 616.025
• DOI: 10.1017/S1049023X18001097
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1049-023X

Abstract

Abstract: Introduction: Recent natural and infrastructural disasters, such as Hurricanes Sandy (2012) and Katrina (2005) and the Northeastern power outage of 2003, have emphasized the need for hospital staff to be trained in disaster management and response. Even an internal hospital disaster may require the safe and efficient evacuation and transfer of patients with varying medical conditions and complications. A notably susceptible population is renal transplant patients, including those with post-transplant complications. Hypothesis: This descriptive study evaluated staff performance of a vertical evacuation drill of renal transplant patients at State University of New York (SUNY) Downstate Medical Center – University Hospital Brooklyn (UHB; Brooklyn, New York USA). Methods: Thirteen standardized patients, 12 of whom received a renal transplant, with varying medical histories, ambulatory ability, and mental status were vertically evacuated by the transplant staff from the eighth floor to the ambulance entrance on the ground floor. Non-ambulatory patients were transported on portable evacuation sleds. Results: All patients were evacuated successfully within 3.5 hours. On a post-drill evaluation form, drill participants self-reported largely positive results concerning their own role in the drill and the evacuation drill itself. Drill evaluators observed very different results, including staff reticence, poor training retention, and lack of leadership. Conclusion: Despite encouraging post-drill evaluation results from the participants, the evacuation drill highlighted several immediate deficiencies. It also demonstrated a significant discrepancy in performance perception between the drill participants and the drill evaluators. RJ Salway, Z Adler, T Williams, F Nwoke, P Roblin, B Arquilla .The challenges of a vertical evacuation drill .Prehosp Disaster Med .2019 ;34(1):25–29.