Frege's Unification. Issue 2 (3rd April 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Boddy, Rachel
• Is Part Of: History and philosophy of logic. Volume 40:Issue 2(2019)
• Page Start: 135
• Page End: 151
• Publication Date: 2019-04-03
• Subjects: Logic -- Periodicals; 160.905
• DOI: 10.1080/01445340.2018.1518103
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0144-5340

Abstract

Abstract : What makes certain definitions fruitful? And how can definitions play an explanatory role? The purpose of this paper is to examine these questions via an investigation of Frege's treatment of definitions. Specifically, I pursue this issue via an examination of Frege's views about the scientific unification of logic and arithmetic. In my view, what interpreters have failed to appreciate is that logicism is a project of unification, not reduction. For Frege, unification involves two separate steps: (1) an account of the content expressed by arithmetical claims and (2) the justification of that content. The distinction between these steps allows us to see that there are two notions of definition at play in Frege's logicist work, viz., one concerned with conceptual analysis, the other concerned with the construction of gap-free proof. I then use this discussion to explain how Frege employs his definitions to defend an epistemological thesis about arithmetic, and to clarify Grundlagen 's fruitfulness condition of definitions, and thereby address two interpretive puzzles from the recent literature.