Thermomechanical fatigue crack growth in a single crystal nickel base superalloy. (May 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Palmert, Frans; Moverare, Johan; Gustafsson, David
• Is Part Of: International journal of fatigue. Volume 122(2019)
• Page Start: 184
• Page End: 198
• Publication Date: 2019-05
• Subjects: Single crystal superalloy -- Thermomechanical fatigue -- Crack growth -- Crack closure; Materials -- Fatigue -- Periodicals; Materials -- Fatigue; Periodicals; 620.1122
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.01.014
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0142-1123

Abstract

Highlights: A compliance-based method is proposed to evaluate crack closure during TMF. For OP-TMF, da/dN vs Δ K was insensitive to the maximum temperature and hold time. For IP-TMF, da/dN vs Δ K increased with temperature and hold time. The hold time influence under IP-TMF is due to a reduction in crack opening force. Abstract: Thermomechanical fatigue crack growth in a single crystal nickel base superalloy was studied. Tests were performed on single edge notched specimens, using in phase and out of phase thermomechanical fatigue cycling with temperature ranges of 100–750 °C and 100–850 °C and hold times at maximum temperature ranging from 10 s to 6 h. Isothermal testing at 100 °C, 750 °C and 850 °C was also performed using the same test setup. A compliance-based method is proposed to experimentally evaluate the crack opening stress and thereby estimate the effective stress intensity factor range Δ K eff for both isothermal and nonisothermal conditions. For in phase thermomechanical fatigue, the crack growth rate is increased if a hold time is applied at the maximum temperature. By using the compliance-based crack opening evaluation, this increase in crack growth rate was explained by an increase in the effective stress intensity factor range which accelerated the cycle dependent crack growth. No significant difference in crack growth rate vs Δ Keff was observed between in phase thermomechanical fatigue tests and isothermal tests at the maximum temperature. For out of phase thermomechanical fatigue, the crack growth rate was insensitive to the maximum temperature and also to the length of hold time at maximum temperature. The crack growth rate vs Δ Keff during out of phase thermomechanical fatigue was significantly higher than during isothermal fatigue at the minimum temperature, even though the advancement of the crack presumably occurs at the same temperature. Dissolution of γ′ precipitates and recrystallization at the crack tip during out of phase thermomechanical fatigue is suggested as a likely explanation for this difference in crack growth rate.