Baseline lymphopenia should not be used as exclusion criteria in early clinical trials investigating immune checkpoint blockers (PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors). (October 2017)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Baseline lymphopenia should not be used as exclusion criteria in early clinical trials investigating immune checkpoint blockers (PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors). (October 2017)
- Main Title:
- Baseline lymphopenia should not be used as exclusion criteria in early clinical trials investigating immune checkpoint blockers (PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors)
- Authors:
- Sun, Roger
Champiat, Stéphane
Dercle, Laurent
Aspeslagh, Sandrine
Castanon, Eduardo
Limkin, Elaine Johanna
Baldini, Capucine
Postel-Vinay, Sophie
Hollebecque, Antoine
Massard, Christophe
Ammari, Samy
Deutsch, Eric
Soria, Jean-Charles
Marabelle, Aurélien
Ferté, Charles - Abstract:
- Abstract: Introduction: A number of phase I immunotherapy trials for cancer patients incorporate the absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) as an inclusion criteria. This study aims to assess whether ALC is associated with a lack of response to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 in early clinical trials. Methods: All consecutive patients treated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy in phase I trials in our institution between December 2011 and January 2014 were reviewed. Baseline ALC, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), Royal-Marsden Hospital (RMH) prognostic score, objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR = SD + PR + CR, stable disease (SD), partial response (PR), complete response (CR)) defined by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumours (RECIST) version 1.1 were retrieved. Results: Out of a total of 167 patients, 48 (28.7%) and 8 patients (4.8%) had baseline ALCs of <1 G/l and <0.5 G/l, respectively. The RECIST change (%) was not correlated with ALC (G/l) (Spearman's rho = −0.06, P = 0.43). We did not observe any difference in terms of ORR (8.3% versus 15.1%, P = 0.32) or of DCR (58.3% versus 61.3%, P = 0.73) between patients with ALC <1 G/l versus >1 G/l. When using 0.5 G/l as ALC threshold, we did not find any difference either in ORR or in DCR. In a multivariate Cox regression analysis, baseline ALC was not associated with overall survival, whereas the RMH and the number of previous lines of treatment remained independent prognostic factors. Conclusions: Baseline ALC wasAbstract: Introduction: A number of phase I immunotherapy trials for cancer patients incorporate the absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) as an inclusion criteria. This study aims to assess whether ALC is associated with a lack of response to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 in early clinical trials. Methods: All consecutive patients treated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy in phase I trials in our institution between December 2011 and January 2014 were reviewed. Baseline ALC, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), Royal-Marsden Hospital (RMH) prognostic score, objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR = SD + PR + CR, stable disease (SD), partial response (PR), complete response (CR)) defined by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumours (RECIST) version 1.1 were retrieved. Results: Out of a total of 167 patients, 48 (28.7%) and 8 patients (4.8%) had baseline ALCs of <1 G/l and <0.5 G/l, respectively. The RECIST change (%) was not correlated with ALC (G/l) (Spearman's rho = −0.06, P = 0.43). We did not observe any difference in terms of ORR (8.3% versus 15.1%, P = 0.32) or of DCR (58.3% versus 61.3%, P = 0.73) between patients with ALC <1 G/l versus >1 G/l. When using 0.5 G/l as ALC threshold, we did not find any difference either in ORR or in DCR. In a multivariate Cox regression analysis, baseline ALC was not associated with overall survival, whereas the RMH and the number of previous lines of treatment remained independent prognostic factors. Conclusions: Baseline ALC was not associated with response to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 in cancer patients enrolled in phase I trials. Patients should not be excluded from early phase clinical trials testing immune checkpoints blockers because of ALC. Highlights: A number of phase I immunotherapy trials exclude patients with low lymphocyte counts. Lymphopenia <1 G/l was not associated with poor outcome in phase I cancer patients. Lymphopenia should not be an exclusion criteria for anti-PD1/PD-L1 phase I trials. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- European journal of cancer. Volume 84(2017)
- Journal:
- European journal of cancer
- Issue:
- Volume 84(2017)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 84, Issue 2017 (2017)
- Year:
- 2017
- Volume:
- 84
- Issue:
- 2017
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2017-0084-2017-0000
- Page Start:
- 202
- Page End:
- 211
- Publication Date:
- 2017-10
- Subjects:
- Phase 1 trial -- Immunotherapy -- Lymphopenia -- Eligibility criteria
Cancer -- Periodicals
Neoplasms -- Periodicals
Cancer -- Périodiques
Cancer
Tumors
Electronic journals
Periodicals
Electronic journals
616.994 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/09598049 ↗
http://rzblx1.uni-regensburg.de/ezeit/warpto.phtml?colors=7&jour_id=2879 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com/dura/browse/journalIssue/09598049 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com.au/dura/browse/journalIssue/09598049 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.07.033 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0959-8049
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3829.725100
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 9622.xml