The Experience of Accreditation of the Reggio Emilia Research Hospital with the OECI Model. (December 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Mazzini, Elisa; Cerullo, Loredana; Mazzi, Giorgio; Costantini, Massimo
• Is Part Of: Tumori. Volume 101:(2015)Supplement 1
• Page Start: S42
• Page End: S46
• Publication Date: 2015-12
• Subjects: Cancer -- Care pathway -- Multidisciplinary -- Research hospital; Cancer -- Periodicals; 616.994
• DOI: 10.5301/tj.5000466
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0300-8916

Abstract

The research hospital Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) of Reggio Emilia has a unique organization that involves a recently recognized IRCCS in oncology within a preexisting general hospital. The IRCCS of Reggio Emilia joined the "Tailored Accreditation Model for Comprehensive Cancer Centers: Validation through the Applicability of the Experimental OECI-based Model to the Network of Cancer IRCCS of the Alliance Against Cancer" and applied the accreditation & designation (A&D) Organisation of European Cancer Institutes (OECI) model in 2013. Before that accreditation, it had never been accredited according to international accreditation systems concerning cancer. By December 2015, the IRCCS of Reggio Emilia completed the first steps of the A&D OECI process (self-assessment period, peer review visit, implementation of the improvement plan). In December 2014, OECI confirmed the accreditation of our IRCCS and its designation as a Clinical Cancer Center and proposed a revisit at 2 years for upgrading the designation to Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC). On the whole, the results given by adhesion to the A&D-OECI project are numerous and positive, under different points of view, formal (European accreditation and designation as a Clinical Cancer Center with possible upgrade to CCC) and substantial (involvement of professionals, attention to ongoing improvement, work on the sectors mainly of interest). The balance between the advantages and disadvantages linked to this accreditation model was positive. Following our experience, we conclude that the model was useful also for our kind of IRCCS, with its features useful for investigating all the sectors of the patient care pathway and research and necessity to stimulate change.