Characterization of Factors Affecting the Detection Limit of EGFR p.T790M in Circulating Tumor DNA. (10th August 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Fahoum, Ibrahim; Forer, Relly; Volodarsky, Dina; Vulih, Inna; Bick, Tova; Sarji, Shada; Bamberger, Zeev; Ben-Izhak, Ofer; Sabo, Edmond; Hershberg, Ruth; Hershkovitz, Dov
• Is Part Of: Technology in cancer research & treatment. Volume 17(2018)
• Publication Date: 2018-08-10
• Subjects: detection limit -- EGFR -- p.T790M -- circulating tumor DNA -- next-generation sequencing; Oncology -- Periodicals; Cancer -- Diagnosis -- Periodicals; Cancer -- Treatment -- Technological innovations -- Periodicals; 616.994
• DOI: 10.1177/1533033818793653
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1533-0346

Abstract

Objective: Circulating tumor DNA is a promising noninvasive tool for cancer monitoring. One of the challenges in applying this tool is the detection of low-frequency mutations. The detection limit of these mutations varies between different molecular methods. The aim of this study is to characterize the factors affecting the limit of detection for epidermal growth factor receptor p.T790M mutation in circulating tumor DNA of patients with lung adenocarcinoma. Methods: DNA was extracted from plasma samples of 102 patients. For sequencing the DNA, we used 2 different next-generation sequencing–based platforms: Ion Torrent Personal Genome Machine (56 cases) and Roche/454 (46 cases). Serially diluted synthetic DNA samples carrying the p.T790M mutation were sequenced using the Ion Torrent Personal Genome Machine for validation. Limit of detection was determined through the analysis of non-hot-spot nonreference reads, which were regarded as sequencing artifacts. Results: The frequency of the non-hot-spot nonreference reads was higher in Ion Torrent Personal Genome Machine compared to Roche/454 (0.07% ± 0.08% and 0.03% ± 0.06%, respectively, P < .001). We found that different base type substitutions occur with different frequency. Since the base substitution leading to p.T790M mutation is C>T transition, its frequency was used to determine the limit of detection for the assay. Based on the C>T non-hot-spot nonreference allele frequency, we found that the limit of detection is 0.18% in Ion Torrent Personal Genome Machine and 0.1% in Roche/454. Based on these values, 48% and 56% of the cases were positive for T790M mutation in Ion Torrent Personal Genome Machine and Roche/454 groups, respectively. Agreement between duplicates was 76% in Ion Torrent Personal Genome Machine and 72% in Roche/454. Using serially diluted synthetic DNA samples carrying the p.T790M mutation, we could identify mutations with allele frequency of 0.18% or more using the Ion Torrent Personal Genome Machine, supporting our approach to determine the detection limit. Conclusion: Both the sequencing platform and the specific nucleotide change affect the limit of detection and should therefore be determined in the validation process of new assays.