Race–Crime Congruency Effects Revisited: Do We Take Defendants' Sexual Orientation Into Account?. Issue 1 (January 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Petsko, Christopher D.; Bodenhausen, Galen V.
• Is Part Of: Social psychological & personality science. Volume 10:Issue 1(2019)
• Page Start: 73
• Page End: 81
• Publication Date: 2019-01
• Subjects: racial bias -- crime perceptions -- stereotyping -- sexual orientation; Personality -- Periodicals; Social psychology -- Periodicals; Electronic journals; 155.2
• DOI: 10.1177/1948550617736111
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1948-5506

Abstract

Decades ago, social psychologists documented a juror decision-making bias called the race–crime congruency effect : a tendency to condemn Black men more than White men for stereotypically Black crimes but to do the reverse for stereotypically White crimes. We conducted two high-powered experiments ( N = 2, 520) to see whether this pattern replicates and to examine whether it is attenuated when the defendant is gay. When participants reported on what the average American juror would do (Experiment 1), we observed greater harshness toward Black defendants accused of stereotypically Black crimes but not the previously documented reversal for stereotypically White crimes. Defendant sexual orientation did not moderate this pattern. When participants reported their own judgments about the same criminal cases (Experiment 2), they expressed greater harshness toward White (vs. Black) defendants and toward heterosexual (vs. gay) defendants. These effects were not moderated by crime type. Implications for the race–crime congruency effect are discussed.