Evaluating disease prediction models using a cohort whose covariate distribution differs from that of the target population. (January 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Powers, Scott; McGuire, Valerie; Bernstein, Leslie; Canchola, Alison J; Whittemore, Alice S
• Is Part Of: Statistical methods in medical research. Volume 28:Number 1(2019)
• Page Start: 309
• Page End: 320
• Publication Date: 2019-01
• Subjects: Cohort selection bias -- calibration -- concordance -- personal predictive model -- weighted-as-needed; Medicine -- Research -- Statistical methods -- Periodicals; Research -- Periodicals; Review Literature -- Periodicals; Statistics -- methods -- Periodicals; Médecine -- Recherche -- Méthodes statistiques -- Périodiques; 610.727
• DOI: 10.1177/0962280217723945
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0962-2802

Abstract

Personal predictive models for disease development play important roles in chronic disease prevention. The performance of these models is evaluated by applying them to the baseline covariates of participants in external cohort studies, with model predictions compared to subjects' subsequent disease incidence. However, the covariate distribution among participants in a validation cohort may differ from that of the population for which the model will be used. Since estimates of predictive model performance depend on the distribution of covariates among the subjects to which it is applied, such differences can cause misleading estimates of model performance in the target population. We propose a method for addressing this problem by weighting the cohort subjects to make their covariate distribution better match that of the target population. Simulations show that the method provides accurate estimates of model performance in the target population, while un-weighted estimates may not. We illustrate the method by applying it to evaluate an ovarian cancer prediction model targeted to US women, using cohort data from participants in the California Teachers Study. The methods can be implemented using open-source code for public use as the R-package RMAP (Risk Model Assessment Package) available athttp://stanford.edu/~ggong/rmap/ .