Hyaline cartilage next generation implants from adipose‐tissue–derived mesenchymal stem cells: Comparative study on 3D‐printed polycaprolactone scaffold patterns. (27th February 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Theodoridis, Konstantinos; Aggelidou, Eleni; Vavilis, Theofanis; Manthou, Maria Eleni; Tsimponis, Antonios; Demiri, Efterpi C.; Boukla, Anna; Salpistis, Christos; Bakopoulou, Athina; Mihailidis, Athanassios; Kritis, Aristeidis
• Is Part Of: Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Volume 13:Number 2(2019)
• Page Start: 342
• Page End: 355
• Publication Date: 2019-02-27
• Subjects: ADMSCs -- cartilage -- PCL scaffold -- pore size -- regenerative medicine -- scaffold architecture -- tissue engineering -- 3D‐printing; Tissue engineering -- Periodicals; Regeneration (Biology) -- Periodicals; 610.28
• DOI: 10.1002/term.2798
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1932-6254

Abstract

Abstract: We used additive manufacturing to fabricate 3D‐printed polycaprolactone scaffolds of different geometry topologies and porosities. We present a comparative analysis of hyaline cartilage development from adipose‐tissue–derived mesenchymal stem cells (ADMSCs) on three different, newly designed scaffold geometry patterns. The first scaffold design (MESO) was based on a rectilinear layer pattern. For the second pattern (RO45), we employed a 45° rotational layer loop. The design for the third scaffold (3DHC) was a three‐dimensional honeycomb‐like pattern with a hexagonal cellular distribution and small square shapes. We examined cell proliferation, colonization, and differentiation, in relation to the scaffold's structure, as well as to the mechanical properties of the final constructs. We gave emphasis on the scaffolds, both microarchitecture and macroarchitecture, for optimal and enhanced chondrogenic differentiation, as an important parameter, not well studied in the literature. Among the three patterns tested, RO45 was the most favourable for chondrogenic differentiation, whereas 3DHC better supported cell proliferation and scaffold penetration, exhibiting also the highest rate of increase onto the mechanical properties of the final construct. We conclude that by choosing the optimal scaffold architecture, the resulting properties of our cartilaginous constructs can better approximate those of the physiological cartilage.