Sampling bias misrepresents the biogeographical significance of constitutive mixotrophs across global oceans. Issue 4 (29th January 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Leles, Suzana Gonçalves; Mitra, Aditee; Flynn, Kevin John; Tillmann, Urban; Stoecker, Diane; Jeong, Hae Jin; Burkholder, JoAnn; Hansen, Per Juel; Caron, David A.; Glibert, Patricia M.; Hallegraeff, Gustaaf; Raven, John A.; Sanders, Robert W.; Zubkov, Mikhail
• Is Part Of: Global ecology & biogeography. Volume 28:Issue 4(2019)
• Page Start: 418
• Page End: 428
• Publication Date: 2019-01-29
• Subjects: allometry -- biogeography -- global -- Longhurst -- mixotrophy -- oceans -- phytoplankton -- taxonomy; Ecology -- Periodicals; Biogeography -- Periodicals; Biodiversity -- Periodicals; Macroevolution -- Periodicals; 577
• DOI: 10.1111/geb.12853
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1466-822X

Abstract

Abstract: Aim: Most protist plankton are mixotrophic, with potential to engage in photoautotrophy and phagotrophy; however, the ecology of these organisms has been misdiagnosed for over a century. A large proportion of these organisms are constitutive mixotrophs (CMs), with an innate ability to photosynthesize. Here, for the first time, an analysis is presented of the biogeography of CMs across the oceans. Location: Global marine ecosystems. Time period: 1970–2018. Major taxa studied: Marine planktonic protists. Methods: Records for CM species, primarily from the Ocean Biogeographic Information System (OBIS), were grouped by taxonomy and size to evaluate sampling efforts across Longhurst's oceanic provinces. Biases were evaluated through nonparametric tests and multivariate analysis. Biogeographies of CMs from OBIS data were compared with data from studies that specifically targeted these organisms. Results: Constitutive mixotrophs of different taxonomic groups, across all size ranges, are ubiquitous. However, strong database biases were detected with respect to organism size, taxonomic groups and region. A strong bias was seen towards dinophytes. Species < 20 µm, especially non‐dinophytes, were least represented, with their recorded distribution limited to coastal regions and to temperate and polar seas. Studies specifically targeting these organisms revealed their distribution to be much wider. Such biases are likely to have occurred owing to a failure to capture and correctly identify these organisms in routine sampling protocols. Main conclusions: Constitutive mixotrophs are dominant members of organisms traditionally termed "phytoplankton". However, lack of routine protocols for measuring phagotrophy in "phytoplankton" protists has led to widespread misrepresentation of the fundamental nature of marine planktonic primary producers; most express both "animal‐like" and "plant‐like" nutrition. Our results have implications for studies of the global biogeography of plankton, of food web dynamics (including models) and of biogeochemical cycling in the oceans.