The interobserver agreement of optical features used to differentiate benign from neoplastic biliary lesions assessed at balloon‐assisted cholangioscopy. Issue 3 (6th January 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Behary, Jason; Keegan, Mathew; Craig, Philip I
• Is Part Of: Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology. Volume 34:Issue 3(2019)
• Page Start: 595
• Page End: 602
• Publication Date: 2019-01-06
• Subjects: balloon‐assisted cholangioscopy -- benign biliary lesion -- benign biliary stricture -- biliary neoplasm -- cholangiocarcinoma -- cholangioscopy -- endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography -- indeterminate biliary lesions -- interobserver agreement; Gastroenterology -- Periodicals; Digestive organs -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Liver -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Gastroenterology -- Periodicals; Liver Diseases -- Periodicals; 616.33
• DOI: 10.1111/jgh.14556
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0815-9319

Abstract

Abstract: Background and Aim: Balloon‐assisted cholangioscopy allows mucosal assessment of the biliary tree with pediatric endoscopes. No validated optical criteria exist to differentiate benign from neoplastic biliary lesions. We aimed to identify, validate, and revalidate optical features differentiating benign from neoplastic biliary lesions. Furthermore, we aimed to determine whether cholangioscopic appearance allows endoscopists to accurately differentiate benign from neoplastic biliary lesions. Methods: Baseline: from 44 de‐identified balloon‐assisted cholangioscopy videos, a blinded investigator analyzed potential optical features distinguishing benign from neoplastic biliary lesions. Validation: during the initial "teaching phase, " 20 endoscopists viewed video clips of 11 optical features identified in the baseline study. At the subsequent "test phase, " 20 further video clips were assessed by the endoscopists blinded to clinical details and questionnaires completed for the presence or absence of optical features, favored diagnosis and diagnostic confidence. Revalidation: The six identified optical features from the validation study with at least moderate agreement were revalidated the same way 12 months later assessing 20 new lesions. Results: Baseline: 11 optical features were found to differentiate benign from neoplastic biliary lesions. Validation and revalidation: six optical features demonstrated at least moderate interobserver agreement (irregular margin, dark mucosa, adherent mucous, papillary projections, tubular, or branched/disorganized surface structures). Endoscopists correctly diagnosed lesions as benign in 89% and neoplastic in 83%. When highly confident, endoscopists correctly diagnosed 96% of benign and 87% neoplastic lesions. Conclusions: Six features were validated and revalidated to differentiate benign from neoplastic biliary lesions. When highly confident with a diagnosis, endoscopists usually differentiate benign from neoplastic biliary lesions.