Framing pictures: A conceptual framework to identify and correct for biases in detection probability of camera traps enabling multi‐species comparison. Issue 4 (23rd January 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Hofmeester, Tim R.; Cromsigt, Joris P. G. M.; Odden, John; Andrén, Henrik; Kindberg, Jonas; Linnell, John D. C.
• Is Part Of: Ecology and evolution. Volume 9:Issue 4(2019)
• Page Start: 2320
• Page End: 2336
• Publication Date: 2019-01-23
• Subjects: animal characteristics -- detectability -- environmental variables -- mammal monitoring -- reuse of data -- trail camera; Ecology -- Periodicals; Evolution -- Periodicals; 577.05
• DOI: 10.1002/ece3.4878
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2045-7758

Abstract

Abstract: Obtaining reliable species observations is of great importance in animal ecology and wildlife conservation. An increasing number of studies use camera traps (CTs) to study wildlife communities, and an increasing effort is made to make better use and reuse of the large amounts of data that are produced. It is in these circumstances that it becomes paramount to correct for the species‐ and study‐specific variation in imperfect detection within CTs. We reviewed the literature and used our own experience to compile a list of factors that affect CT detection of animals. We did this within a conceptual framework of six distinct scales separating out the influences of (a) animal characteristics, (b) CT specifications, (c) CT set‐up protocols, and (d) environmental variables. We identified 40 factors that can potentially influence the detection of animals by CTs at these six scales. Many of these factors were related to only a few overarching parameters. Most of the animal characteristics scale with body mass and diet type, and most environmental characteristics differ with season or latitude such that remote sensing products like NDVI could be used as a proxy index to capture this variation. Factors that influence detection at the microsite and camera scales are probably the most important in determining CT detection of animals. The type of study and specific research question will determine which factors should be corrected. Corrections can be done by directly adjusting the CT metric of interest or by using covariates in a statistical framework. Our conceptual framework can be used to design better CT studies and help when analyzing CT data. Furthermore, it provides an overview of which factors should be reported in CT studies to make them repeatable, comparable, and their data reusable. This should greatly improve the possibilities for global scale analyses of (reused) CT data. Abstract : Detection of animals by camera traps is determined by processes at different scales. These need to be included in study design and analysis of camera trapping data. Camera trapping data can only be reused for future studies when factors influencing detection are properly reported.