Comparison of endothelial/Descemet's membrane complex thickness with endothelial cell density for the diagnosis of corneal transplant rejection. (November 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Smith, Christopher; Kaitis, Daniel; Winegar, Jordan; Edelstein, Sean; Council, Matthew; Kontadakis, George; Bentivegna, Rocio; Shousha, Mohamed Abou
• Is Part Of: Therapeutic advances in ophthalmology. Volume 10(2018)
• Publication Date: 2018-11
• Subjects: corneal graft rejection -- Descemet's membrane -- endothelial cell density -- optical coherence tomography; Ophthalmology -- Periodicals; Eye -- Diseases -- Periodicals; 617.7005
• DOI: 10.1177/2515841418814187
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2515-8414

Abstract

Purpose: This study compared the effectiveness of endothelial/Descemet's membrane complex thickness obtained using high-definition anterior segment optical coherence tomography with endothelial cell density obtained using confocal microscopy as diagnostic tools in predicting corneal transplant rejection. Methods: This observational, prospective, cross-sectional study evaluated penetrating keratoplasty grafts. Slit lamp examination organized the grafts into healthy or rejecting grafts. Grafts were scanned using both high-definition anterior segment optical coherence tomography and confocal microscopy. Central corneal thickness, endothelial/Descemet's membrane complex thickness, endothelial cell density, and coefficient of variation were each compared with the clinical status. Descemet's rejection index, defined by endothelial/Descemet's membrane complex thickness divided by central corneal thickness multiplied by 33, further compared endothelial/Descemet's membrane complex thickness with central corneal thickness. Results: Endothelial/Descemet's membrane complex thickness, central corneal thickness, and Descemet's rejection index were all able to differentiate between clear and rejected corneal grafts ( p < 0.0001, p = 0.001, and p = 0.012, respectively). Endothelial cell density and coefficient of variation did not correlate with the clinical status ( p = 0.054 and p = 0.102, respectively). Endothelial/Descemet's membrane complex thickness had the largest area under the curve using receiver operating characteristic curves ( p < 0.0001). Endothelial/Descemet's membrane complex thickness had a sensitivity of 86% and specificity of 81% with a cutoff value of >16.0 µm ( p < 0.0001). The sensitivity and specificity of endothelial cell density were both 71% with a cutoff value of ⩽897 cells/mm 2 ( p = 0.053). There was a high correlation between endothelial/Descemet's membrane complex thickness and both Descemet's rejection index and central corneal thickness ( p < 0.0001). Conclusion: Endothelial/Descemet's membrane complex thickness measured by high-definition anterior segment optical coherence tomography is a useful parameter for the diagnosis of corneal graft rejection. The diagnostic performance of endothelial/Descemet's membrane complex thickness was significantly better than that of endothelial cell density and central corneal thickness. Endothelial cell density and the coefficient of variation were unable to diagnose corneal graft rejection in our cross-sectional study.