Comparison between autologous bone grafts and acrylic (PMMA) implants – A retrospective analysis of 286 cranioplasty procedures. (March 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Vince, G.H.; Kraschl, J.; Rauter, H.; Stein, M.; Grossauer, S.; Uhl, E.
• Is Part Of: Journal of clinical neuroscience. Volume 61(2019)
• Page Start: 205
• Page End: 209
• Publication Date: 2019-03
• Subjects: Decompressive craniectomy -- Cranioplasty -- Complications; Brain -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Neurosciences -- Periodicals; Nervous system -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Brain -- surgery -- Periodicals; Neurosurgical Procedures -- Periodicals; Neurosciences -- Periodicals; Electronic journals; 616.8
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2018.10.017
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0967-5868

Abstract

Highlights: Remodeling the cranial vault after decompressive craniectomy is a challenge. Cranioplasty involves using free-hand PMMA, autologous bone or personalized implants. Autologous bone flap and free hand PMMA are procedures with significant morbidity. No significant differences were seen between the complication rates. Abstract: Decompressive craniectomy (DC) is an accepted surgical technique for reducing life-threatening levels of intracranial pressure. Remodelling the cranial vault following DC can constitute a reconstructive challenge and is known to carry significant morbidity. The aim of our study was to evaluate acrylic versus autologous cranioplasty with regard to specific complication rates. A retrospective analysis was conducted of 286 consecutive adult patients who underwent cranioplasty following supratentorial decompressive craniectomy at our institution between January 2003 and June 2013. The patients were followed based on medical records, operative reports, imaging and outpatient contacts in the postoperative course. A total of 221/286 patients in our series received an autologous bone flap. 65/286 cranioplasty procedures were carried out using acrylic (PMMA) implants to cover uni- or bilateral defects. Within the follow-up period a total of 100 operative revisions were performed. 33.3% patients in the autologous bone group and 40.6% of patients in the acrylic group developed complications requiring surgical attention. The main reason for revision was infection with a total of 37 revisions necessary to treat disturbed wound healing. Postoperative sub- and epidural hematomas requiring revision were more frequent in the acrylic group. Resorption of the autologous bone flap requiring operative revision was seen in 8/222 (3.6%) cases. Other complications included loosening of the implant or dislocation. From our data it can be concluded that cranioplasty procedures using autologous bone-flaps and acrylic implants carry signifikant morbidity, but that both are justifiable techniques for cranioplasty in adult patients.