Abstract reasoning and the interpretation of basic conditionals. (2nd January 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Markovits, Henry; de Chantal, Pier-Luc; Brisson, Janie
• Is Part Of: Thinking & reasoning. Volume 25:Number 1(2019)
• Page Start: 1
• Page End: 13
• Publication Date: 2019-01-02
• Subjects: Conditional reasoning -- interpretation -- basic conditionals -- abstract reasoning; Thought and thinking -- Periodicals; Reasoning (Psychology) -- Periodicals; 153.43
• DOI: 10.1080/13546783.2018.1452795
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1354-6783

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Studies examining the interpretation that is given to if–then statementstypically use what are referred to as basic conditionals, which give contextless relations between two unrelated concrete terms (If the ball is blue, then the shape is square). However, there is some evidence that basic conditionals require a more abstract form of representation. In order to examine this, we presented participants with truth-table tasks involving either basic conditionals or conditionals referring to imaginary categories (If it is a bori, then it has red wings), and standard conditional inference tasks with abstract and familiar premises. As expected, fewer typical defective conditional interpretations were given to basic conditionals. In addition, partial correlations showed a unique relationship between the interpretation of basic conditionals and abstract inferential reasoning. Results suggest that people process basic conditionals as a form of abstract reasoning, and that the interpretation of conditionals must consider the semantic context.