Ethnic/National Identity Incrimination in and through Social Constructionism. Issue 2 (17th February 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Drousioti, Kalli
• Is Part Of: European legacy. Volume 24:Issue 2(2019)
• Page Start: 181
• Page End: 201
• Publication Date: 2019-02-17
• Subjects: hegemony -- cosmopolitanism -- patriotism -- affect -- imagined community; Europe -- History -- Periodicals; Europe -- Intellectual life -- Periodicals; 940.05
• DOI: 10.1080/10848770.2018.1549387
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1084-8770

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Social constructionism, and Ernesto Laclau and Chantal Mouffe's discourse theory in particular, are well-known for their anti-essentialist understanding of identity. Hence these discourses have theoretically been utilized for understanding social identity construction and for deconstructing identities. However, I claim that social constructionism and Laclau and Mouffe's discourse theory may have the as yet non-theorized operation of detecting and combating wholesale indictments of identities. This operation helps us diagnose how ethnic identity and affect become incriminated as supposedly inextricably intertwined with racism, chauvinism and related pathologies. Yet interestingly, instead of unveiling and critiquing the new hegemony of blanket indictment of ethnic identity/affect, social constructionism and Laclau and Mouffe's discourse theory have been used to incriminate identity as such. The present article interprets Laclau and Mouffe's discourse theory against the grain to chastise the tendency to declare ethnic identity/affect as the new enemy. It shows how such new, hegemonic incrimination aspires to fill the empty signifier of peaceful coexistence with otherness, yet runs the risk of effacing otherness. The article concludes with an example of a reconstructive alternative.