Functional level assessment of individuals with transtibial limb loss: Evaluation in the clinical setting versus objective community ambulatory activity. (March 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Orendurff, Michael S; Raschke, Silvia U; Winder, Lorne; Moe, David; Boone, David A; Kobayashi, Toshiki
• Is Part Of: Journal of rehabilitation and assistive technologies engineering. Volume 3(2016)
• Publication Date: 2016-03
• Subjects: Amputee -- ambulation -- gait -- K-level -- prosthesis; Rehabilitation technology -- Periodicals; 617.03
• DOI: 10.1177/2055668316636316
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2055-6683

Abstract

The functional level (K level) of prosthetic users is used to choose appropriate prosthetic components, but ratings may highly subjective. A more objective and robust method to determine K level may be appealing. The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between K level determined in the clinic to K level based on real world ambulatory activity data collected by StepWatch. Twelve individuals with transtibial limb loss gave informed consent to participate. K level assessments performed in the clinic by a single treating prosthetist were compared with a calculated estimate based on seven days of real world ambulatory activity patterns using linear regression. There was good agreement between the two methods of determining K level with R 2 = 0.775 ( p < 0.001). The calculated estimate of K level based on actual ambulatory activity in real world settings appears to be similar to the treating prosthetist's assessment of K level based on gait observation and patient responses in the clinic. Clinic-based ambulatory capacity in transtibial prosthetic users appears to correlate with real world ambulatory behavior in this small cohort. Determining functional level based on real world ambulatory activity may supplement clinic-based tests of functional capacity.