Evaluation of a shared decision making educational program: The Ottawa Decision Support Tutorial. Issue 2 (February 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Boland, Laura; Légaré, France; Carley, Meg; Graham, Ian D.; O'Connor, Annette M.; Lawson, Margaret L.; Stacey, Dawn
• Is Part Of: Patient education and counseling. Volume 102:Issue 2(2019)
• Page Start: 324
• Page End: 331
• Publication Date: 2019-02
• Subjects: Education and training -- Shared decision making -- Knowledge -- Acceptability; Patient education -- Periodicals; Health counseling -- Periodicals; Health education -- Periodicals; Counseling -- Periodicals; Patient Education -- Periodicals; Éducation des patients -- Périodiques; Counseling -- Périodiques; Éducation sanitaire -- Périodiques; 615.5071
• DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.09.008
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0738-3991

Abstract

Highlights: ODST users have good shared decision making and decision support knowledge. Most users achieve pass the ODST knowledge test (> 75%) on their first attempt. Users rate the ODST as an acceptable shared decision making educational intervention. Abstract: Objective: To evaluate the Ottawa Decision Support Tutorial (ODST), an open-access shared decision making educational program. Methods: We conducted a post-test study. Eligible participants completed a knowledge test and/or acceptability survey after completing ODST version 1 (2007–2013), version 2 (2013–2015), or version 3 (2015–2017). We conducted descriptive analysis and compared outcomes across versions using log transformed linear regression (knowledge) and log binomial regression (acceptability). Content analysis explored verbatim suggestions to improve the ODST. Results: Overall, 6604 users completed the knowledge test and 4276 completed the acceptability survey. The median knowledge test score was 8/10 (IQR = 7–9) with 68% of users achieving a passing grade of 7.5/10. Users who completed version 2 had the highest median knowledge scores (version 1 = 7.9, version 2 = 8.5, version 3 = 8.0, p < 0.001) and pass rate (version 1 = 63%, version 2 = 73%, version 3 = 69%). Acceptability was high, with 90% reporting a good or excellent overall impression. Few users suggested improvements (readability, presentation, audiovisual). Conclusions: Most users passed the ODST knowledge test and rated the tutorial as acceptable. We will use feedback to improve the ODST. Practice Implications: The ODST is an inexpensive and widely accessible intervention that can be used to educate healthcare providers about SDM and decision support.