Evaluation of deformable image registration accuracy for CT images of the thorax region. (January 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Sarudis, Sebastian; Karlsson, Anna; Bibac, Dan; Nyman, Jan; Bäck, Anna
• Is Part Of: Physica medica. Volume 57(2019)
• Page Start: 191
• Page End: 199
• Publication Date: 2019-01
• Subjects: Deformable image registration -- Breathing motion -- Adaptive radiotherapy -- Lung cancer; Medical physics -- Periodicals; Biophysics -- Periodicals; Biophysics -- Periodicals; Imagerie médicale -- Périodiques; Radiothérapie -- Périodiques; Rayons X -- Sécurité -- Mesures -- Périodiques; Physique -- Périodiques; Médecine -- Périodiques; 610.153
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2018.12.030
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1120-1797

Abstract

Highlights: Visually acceptable DIRs of phantom CTs were achieved for tumor shifts ≤30 mm. The accuracy of a DIR was not affected by CT image slice thickness. Visually acceptable DIRs of patient CTs were achieved for structure shifts ≤16 mm. Visually acceptable DIRs gave DVH deviations ≤3.6%. Abstract: Purpose: Evaluate the performance of three commercial deformable image registration (DIR) solutions on computed tomography (CT) image-series of the thorax. Methods: DIRs were performed on CT image-series of a thorax phantom with tumor inserts and on six 4-dimensional patient CT image-series of the thorax. The center of mass shift (CMS), dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and dose-volume-histogram (DVH) parameters were used to evaluate the accuracy. Dose calculations on deformed patient images were compared to calculations on un-deformed images for the gross tumor volume (GTV) (Dmean, D98% ), lung (V20Gy, V12Gy ), heart and spinal cord (D2% ). Results: Phantom structures with constant volume and shifts ≤30 mm were reproduced with visually acceptable accuracy (DSC ≥ 0.91, CMS ≤ 0.9 mm) for all software solutions. Deformations including volume changes were less accurate with 9/12 DIRs considered visually unacceptable. In patients, organs were reproduced with DSC ≥ 0.83. GTV shifts ≤1.6 cm were reproduced with visually acceptable accuracy by all software while larger shifts resulted in failures for at least one of the software. In total, the best software succeeded in 18/25 DIRs while the worst succeeded in 12/25 DIRs. Visually acceptable DIRs resulted in deviations ≤3.0% of the prescribed dose and ≤3.6% of the total structure volume in the evaluated DVH-parameters. Conclusions: The take home message from the results of this study is the importance to have a visually acceptable registration. DSC and CMS are not predictive of the associated dose deviation. Visually acceptable DIRs implied dose deviations ≤3.0%.