Coupling economic models and environmental assessment methods to support regional policies: A critical review. (10th April 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Beaussier, Thomas; Caurla, Sylvain; Bellon-Maurel, Véronique; Loiseau, Eleonore
• Is Part Of: Journal of cleaner production. Volume 216(2019)
• Page Start: 408
• Page End: 421
• Publication Date: 2019-04-10
• Subjects: Model coupling -- Economic modelling -- Environmental assessement -- Integrated assessment -- Regional policy -- Sustainability; ABM Agent Based Modelling -- CGE Computable General Equilibrium -- EEIM Econnomic-Environment Integrated Model -- FP Footprint -- IO Input Output -- LCA Life Cycle Assessment -- LUC Land Use Change -- MFA Material Flow Analysis -- PE Partial Equilibrium -- SD System Dynamics; Factory and trade waste -- Management -- Periodicals; Manufactures -- Environmental aspects -- Periodicals; Déchets industriels -- Gestion -- Périodiques; Usines -- Aspect de l'environnement -- Périodiques; 628.5
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.020
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0959-6526

Abstract

Abstract: This review analyses and compares the most promising methods to perform ex ante economic and environmental assessment of policies at the meso scale, i.e. from local communities to subnational regions. These methods called Economic-Environment Integrated Models (EEIM) are based on the coupling of formalised economic modelling tools with environmental assessment methods. The economic modelling tools considered are Input Output (IO) models, Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) and Partial Equilibrium (PE) models, Agent-Based models (ABM), and System Dynamics (SD) models, which we pair with environmental assessment methods such as Footprints (FP), Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), or Material Flow Analysis (MFA). A grid of criteria is developed to perform a qualitative rating of the EEIMs according to existing literature. The grid encompasses the detail level of the economic modelling, the level of coupling between environmental and economic tools, the quality and diversity of indicators, the ability to account for diverse indirect effects, spatial differentiation, time aspects, and the coupled model usability. First, the results show that the couplings do not perform on the same criteria, which shows complementarity to deal with diverse issues. Second, overall, for most criteria, PE/CGE models coupled with FP/LCA ranked highest. Third, a few case studies showed that couplings involving a third tool can be beneficial— for instance AB modelling or MFA with PE/CGE-LCA/FP may allow to overcome some shortcomings such as agent behaviour modelling or data availability for biophysical flows. Highlights: Reviews couplings of 5 types of economic models and 3 environmental assessment tools. Partial and Equilibrium models coupled with footprints methods and LCA rank well. Building couplings involving a 3rd model addresses some shortcomings. Scarcity of subnational scale data is a frequent obstacle.