A comparison of a broad range of EEG acquisition devices – is there any difference for SSVEP BCIs?. Issue 4 (2nd October 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Zerafa, Rosanne; Camilleri, Tracey; Falzon, Owen; Camilleri, Kenneth P.
• Is Part Of: Brain-computer interfaces. Volume 5:Issue 4(2018)
• Page Start: 121
• Page End: 131
• Publication Date: 2018-10-02
• Subjects: Brain-computer interface -- dry electrodes -- wireless EEG -- low-cost EEG -- benchmark for EEG systems; Brain-computer interfaces -- Periodicals; Neurology -- Periodicals; 616.800285
• DOI: 10.1080/2326263X.2018.1550710
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2326-263X

Abstract

ABSTRACT: This study compared the signal quality of six commercially available electroencephalography (EEG) signal acquisition systems in order to evaluate their application in a brain-computer interface (BCI). This is one of the largest studies in terms of subjects and systems focusing on comparing different EEG systems, involving the whole variety in terms of amplifier (research grade, consumer grade), electrode type (gel-based, saline-based, dry, active, passive), transmission technique (wired, wireless), and cost. We established an approach to evaluate the signal quality by means of a steady-state visually evoked potentials (SSVEP) experiment. This demonstrated that although high-end traditional EEG equipment may be the best choice for clinical applications, low-end wireless research grade gel-based EEG systems are comparable in terms of signal quality and therefore may be an effective alternative to BCIs developed for real environments. Other factors, such as end user and application, should also be considered when deciding which EEG system is best suited for a BCI.